Re: AW: int4 or int32 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: AW: int4 or int32
Date
Msg-id 200101231433.JAA05873@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to AW: int4 or int32  (Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> 
> > There were only a few to fix, so I fixed them.
> > 
> > > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > > > Which one of these should we use?
> > > > int4 is a data type, int32 isn't.  c.h has DatumGetInt8, but no
> > > > DatumGetInt64; it also has DatumGetInt32 but no 
> > DatumGetInt4.  fmgr has
> 
> Wait a sec !
> The patch to timestamp.h and date.h replaces int4 with int instead of int32.
> At least the timestamp.h struct is on disk stuff, thus the patch is not so good :-)

Fixed to int32 now.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pete Forman
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres memory management
Next
From: Ryan Kirkpatrick
Date:
Subject: Re: [PORTS] PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status...