Re: [PATCHES] RE: SSL Connections [doc PATCH] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [PATCHES] RE: SSL Connections [doc PATCH]
Date
Msg-id 200101241518.KAA23757@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: [PATCHES] RE: SSL Connections [doc PATCH]  (Magnus Hagander <mha@sollentuna.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> That would probably be good, yes :-)
>
> You shuold then change:
> mv privkey.pem cert.pem.pw
> openssl rsa -in cert.pem.pw -out cert.pem
>
> to
> openssl rsa -in privkey.pem -out cert.pem
>
> (Sorry, don't have access to the SGML source now, so I can't give you a
> patch)

OK, the SGML diff is:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Index: doc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/projects/pgsql/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml,v
retrieving revision 1.46
diff -c -r1.46 runtime.sgml
*** doc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml    2001/01/08 21:01:54    1.46
--- doc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml    2001/01/24 15:17:09
***************
*** 1911,1918 ****
     To remove the passphrase (as you must if you want automatic start-up of
     the postmaster), run the commands
  <programlisting>
! mv privkey.pem cert.pem.pw
! openssl rsa -in cert.pem.pw -out cert.pem
  </programlisting>
     Enter the old passphrase to unlock the existing key. Now do
  <programlisting>
--- 1911,1917 ----
     To remove the passphrase (as you must if you want automatic start-up of
     the postmaster), run the commands
  <programlisting>
! openssl rsa -in privkey.pem -out cert.pem
  </programlisting>
     Enter the old passphrase to unlock the existing key. Now do
  <programlisting>

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Open 7.1 items
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PgAccess - small bug?