Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone
Date
Msg-id 5874.980722674@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Perhaps there could be some sort of /etc/postgresql.conf file that is read
> by both client and server that can control these sort of aspects.

Maybe ... but it seems to me that still leaves us with the issue of
a single pathname that must be known a-priori to both client and server.
You've just changed that path from "/tmp/..." to "/etc/...".

Moreover, such a setup would make it substantially more painful to run
multiple versions of Postgres on a single machine.  Right now, as long
as each version has a different default port number, it works great.
Try to put the default port number in /etc/postgresql.conf, and you've
got a problem.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone
Next
From: teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone