> > Well, it's not good idea because of SIGTERM is used for ABORT + EXIT
> > (pg_ctl -m fast stop), but shouldn't ABORT clean up everything?
>
> Er, shouldn't ABORT leave the system in the exact state that it's
> in so that one can get a crashdump/traceback on a wedged process
> without it trying to clean up after itself?
Sorry, I've meant "transaction abort"...
Vadim
