Re: Nothing larger then int8? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

To answer your question, wouldn't numeric(30,0) be the correct?

-alex
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote:

> 
> hrrmm ... ignore this ... I'm suspecting that what I did was copied in
> sum() data from an old table that had bytes declared as int4, without
> casting it to int8 before storing it to the new table ...
> 
> if anyone is interested, here is one days worth of http traffic for the
> main PostgreSQL.Org server ... this doesn't include the traffic that the
> mirror sites absorb:
> 
> 1160643846 / ( 1024 * 1024 * 1024 )
> 1.08gig
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> 
> >
> > I'm logging traffic to a database, so that I can do analysis on usage and
> > whatnot, and I need something bigger then int8 :(
> >
> > /tmp/psql.edit.70.79087: 6 lines, 222 characters.
> >       ip       |  maxbytes   | port |        runtime
> > ---------------+-------------+------+------------------------
> >  216.126.84.28 |  2169898055 |   80 | 2001-01-16 00:00:00-05
> >  216.126.84.28 |   160579228 |  873 | 2001-01-16 00:00:00-05
> >  216.126.84.28 |      365270 |   20 | 2001-01-16 00:00:00-05
> >  216.126.84.28 |      196256 |   21 | 2001-01-16 00:00:00-05
> >  216.126.84.28 |      195238 |   22 | 2001-01-16 00:00:00-05
> >  216.126.84.28 |      182492 | 1024 | 2001-01-16 00:00:00-05
> >  216.126.84.28 |      171155 |  143 | 2001-01-16 00:00:00-05
> >  216.126.84.28 | -1392384544 |   80 | 2001-01-13 00:00:00-05
> >  216.126.84.28 | -1392384544 |   80 | 2001-01-04 00:00:00-05
> >  216.126.84.28 | -1392384544 |   80 | 2001-01-05 00:00:00-05
> >  216.126.84.28 | -1392384544 |   80 | 2001-01-06 00:00:00-05
> >  216.126.84.28 | -1392384544 |   80 | 2001-01-07 00:00:00-05
> >  216.126.84.28 | -1392384544 |   80 | 2001-01-08 00:00:00-05
> >  216.126.84.28 | -1392384544 |   80 | 2001-01-14 00:00:00-05
> >  216.126.84.28 | -1452855018 |   80 | 2001-01-15 00:00:00-05
> >  216.126.84.28 | -1452855018 |   80 | 2001-01-10 00:00:00-05
> >  216.126.84.28 | -1452855018 |   80 | 2001-01-09 00:00:00-05
> >  216.126.84.28 | -1513325492 |   80 | 2001-01-03 00:00:00-05
> >  216.126.84.28 | -1694736914 |   80 | 2001-01-12 00:00:00-05
> >  216.126.84.28 | -1815677862 |   80 | 2001-01-11 00:00:00-05
> >
> > hub_traf_stats=# \d daily_stats
> >        Table "daily_stats"
> >  Attribute |   Type    | Modifier
> > -----------+-----------+----------
> >  ip        | inet      |
> >  port      | integer   |
> >  bytes     | bigint    |
> >  runtime   | timestamp |
> >
> > do we have anything larger to work with?  I've checked docs, but that
> > looks like about it :(
> >
> > Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
> > Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> > primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
> >
> >
> 
> Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
> Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
> 
>