Re: Missing ColLabel tokens - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Missing ColLabel tokens
Date
Msg-id 22697.978644672@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Missing ColLabel tokens  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Missing ColLabel tokens
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> I have noticed that AND and TRAILING could be made ColLabel's without
> further changes.  Currently they are completely reserved.  (This is
> especially odd given that OR is a ColLabel.)  Would that be okay to
> change?

If you don't get shift/reduce conflicts, go for it.

> (For the interested, the only other completely reserved tokens are TYPE
> and AS.)

I suspect we're stuck on that for AS.  However, TYPE is actually allowed
as a ColId, via the 'generic' production, so in reality it's not
reserved.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ron Peterson
Date:
Subject: md5 c code
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing ColLabel tokens