Re: pg_shadow.usecatupd attribute - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alex Pilosov
Subject Re: pg_shadow.usecatupd attribute
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSO.4.10.10101232115020.10091-100000@spider.pilosoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_shadow.usecatupd attribute  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_shadow.usecatupd attribute
List pgsql-hackers
Just to clarify for stupid me: you want to remove it and forbid catalog
updates or remove it and allow catalog updates? (I hope its latter :)

On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > While I'm at it and before I forget the 76 places one needs to edit to
> > add/remove a system catalog column, what are people's feelings about the
> > usecatupd column?
> 
> Unless someone pops up and says that they're actually using it,
> I'd agree with removing it.  It seems like the sort of thing that
> might be a good idea but isn't actually getting used.
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Does Oracle store values in indices?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: $PGDATA/base/???