Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ]
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0101250036010.1469-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ]  (Frank Joerdens <frank@joerdens.de>)
Responses Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ]
Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ]
List pgsql-hackers
Frank Joerdens writes:

[randomly varying set of regression tests fail]

> Running the tests on my Linux box gives no failed tests. Must I assume
> that those failed tests indicate some issue that is is detrimental to
> the proper functioning of the server on this Solaris installation? Do
> you want the regression.diffs?

Could you go into src/test/regress/pg_regress.sh and edit around line 162

#case $host_platform in
#    *-*-qnx* | *beos*)       unix_sockets=no;;
#    *)
#        unix_sockets=yes;;
#esac

(i.e., ensure that unix_sockets is set to 'no'), and rerun 'make check'.

I have experienced before that Unix sockets will cause random connection
abortions on Solaris, which will cause the regression tests to fail
arbitrarily.

> I also tried using the Sun compiler, which didn't work at all.

details on "didn't work" requested...

> now I get scary stuff like:
>
> ----------------------- begin scary stuff -----------------------
> test int2                 ... ERROR:  pg_atoi: error in "34.5": can't
> parse ".5"
> ERROR:  pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Result too large
> ERROR:  pg_atoi: error in "asdf": can't parse "asdf"

This is normal.  The regression tests sometimes involve intentional
invalid input.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: This script will crash the connection
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: unixODBC again :-(