Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joel Burton
Subject Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd)
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0101221240490.3334-100000@olympus.scw.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd)  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>)
Responses Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd)  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:

> And this case can be handled within one database by having multiple
> schema, one for each package. It's not there yet, but it's a simpler
> solution than the generic solution. The problem (as others have mentioned)
> is that we don't want to open the door to remote access until we have a
> two-phase transaction commit mechanism in place. Doing it any other way
> is not a 'partial solution', it's a corrupt database waiting to happen.

What does '2-phase transaction commit mechanism' mean in this case?

-- 
Joel Burton   <jburton@scw.org>
Director of Information Systems, Support Center of Washington



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mitch Vincent"
Date:
Subject: Beta 3 question(s)
Next
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd)