Re: AW: Shouldn't this be an error? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: AW: Shouldn't this be an error?
Date
Msg-id 200101291744.MAA20512@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: AW: Shouldn't this be an error?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> missing SQL features hereabouts also, such as being able to write
> a DEFAULTed column explicitly:
>     INSERT ... VALUES('foo', DEFAULT, 42);
> and being able to insert multiple explicit rows:
>     INSERT ... VALUES('foo', DEFAULT, 42), VALUES('bar', 99, 44);
> I think we should deal with all of these issues at once, which means
> it's not something to try to fix for 7.1.  Bruce, would you add a
> TODO item?
> 
>   * Bring INSERT ... VALUES up to full SQL92 spec.

Added to TODO:
 * Bring INSERT ... VALUES up to full SQL92 spec, disallow missing columns

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: Shouldn't this be an error?
Next
From: Olivier PRENANT
Date:
Subject: Re: BLOB HOWTO??