Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 December 2000

• 00:06   Re: Re: [SQL] Rules with Conditions: Bug, or Misunderstanding Mark Hollomon
• 01:27   Re: beta testing version ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 01:41   [GENERAL] DROP TABLE, and children? (fwd) Alvaro Herrera
• 01:53   Re: Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL GH
• 02:00   Re: beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
• 03:33   Re: Re: [SQL] Rules with Conditions: Bug, or Misunderstanding Tom Lane
• 04:54   Re: beta testing version Alex Pilosov
• 04:58   Operators and commutation Thomas Lockhart
• 05:06   Re: beta testing version Vadim Mikheev
• 05:17   Re: Operators and commutation Tom Lane
• 06:21   Re: beta testing version ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 06:30   Re: beta testing version Ian Lance Taylor
• 06:30   Bitmap index 
• 06:55   Re: beta testing version ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 07:01   AW: beta testing version Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:20   AW: Re: [SQL] Rules with Conditions: Bug, or Misunderst anding Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:12   Re: beta testing version Philip Warner
• 12:24   Re: [Fwd: Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ?] mlw
• 13:02   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 13:25   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 13:27   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 14:38   Re: beta testing version Vadim Mikheev
• 17:03   Re: beta testing version ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 17:25   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 17:26   Re: beta testing version ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 17:29   WAL information Mitch Vincent
• 17:31   Re: beta testing version ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 17:49   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 18:04   RE: WAL information Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:28   Re: beta testing version ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 19:00   Re: beta testing version ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 19:08   Re: [SQL] Rules with Conditions: Bug, or Misunderstanding Joel Burton
• 19:29   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 20:07   Re: [SQL] Rules with Conditions: Bug, or Misunderstanding Tom Lane
• 20:35   COPY BINARY is broken... Tom Lane
• 20:54   Re: COPY BINARY is broken... Alfred Perlstein
• 20:58   Re: COPY BINARY is broken... Tom Lane
• 21:09   RE: COPY BINARY is broken... Mikheev, Vadim
• 21:11   RE: COPY BINARY is broken... Mikheev, Vadim
• 21:14   Re: COPY BINARY is broken... Alfred Perlstein
• 21:49   Re: COPY BINARY is broken... Don Baccus
• 22:24   ODBC Driver Michael Fork
• 23:47   ALTER FUNCTION problem Mark Hollomon
• 23:47   Re: Re: [SQL] Rules with Conditions: Bug, or Misunderstanding Mark Hollomon

2 December 2000

• 03:11   Re: ALTER FUNCTION problem Tom Lane
• 03:18   Re: Re: [SQL] Rules with Conditions: Bug, or Misunderstanding Tom Lane
• 14:36   Re: beta testing version Peter Eisentraut
• 16:36   Re: beta testing version Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
• 17:37   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 19:51   Re: beta testing version Ross J. Reedstrom
• 20:20   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 20:22   Re: beta testing version Adam Haberlach
• 20:36   Re: beta testing version Tom Samplonius
• 20:42   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 20:43   Re: beta testing version Ross J. Reedstrom
• 21:28   RI Types Michael Fork
• 21:46   Re: RI Types Don Baccus
• 22:20   Re: COPY BINARY is broken... Samuel Sieb

3 December 2000

• 01:20   Re: beta testing version Thomas Lockhart
• 01:36   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 02:03   core dump? OID/database corruption? mlw
• 02:04   Re: beta testing version Adam Haberlach
• 02:22   SQL to retrieve FK's, Update/Delete action, etc. Michael Fork
• 02:41   Re: beta testing version Thomas Lockhart
• 03:02   Re: beta testing version Ron Chmara
• 03:42   Re: beta testing version Peter Bierman
• 03:49   Re: core dump? OID/database corruption? Tom Lane
• 04:22   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 04:22   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 04:22   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 04:52   Re: beta testing version Vadim Mikheev
• 05:49   Re: beta testing version kumar1@home.com (Prasanth A. Kumar)
• 10:01   Re: beta testing version Peter Eisentraut
• 11:15   Re: beta testing version Ned Lilly
• 12:04   Re: beta testing version Horst Herb
• 12:13   Re: beta testing version Horst Herb
• 13:06   Patches applied Thomas Lockhart
• 13:41   Re: beta testing version mlw
• 13:58   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 14:49   Re: COPY BINARY is broken... Adriaan Joubert
• 15:10   Re: COPY BINARY is broken... Tom Lane
• 18:01   Re: beta testing version Vadim Mikheev
• 18:28   Re: beta testing version Gary MacDougall
• 18:29   Re: beta testing version mlw
• 19:07   Re: beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
• 19:10   Re: beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
• 19:22   Re: beta testing version Hannu Krosing
• 19:23   Re: beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
• 19:24   Re: beta testing version teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind GlomsrØd)
• 19:43   Re: beta testing version Hannu Krosing
• 19:52   Re: beta testing version Hannu Krosing
• 20:17   Re: beta testing version mlw
• 20:31   RI tutorial needs tech review Joel Burton
• 21:08   Re: beta testing version Gary MacDougall
• 21:13   Re: beta testing version teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind GlomsrØd)
• 21:16   Re: broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte support (FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE) ? Tom Lane
• 21:19   Re: beta testing version mlw
• 21:22   Re: beta testing version Gary MacDougall
• 21:27   Re: beta testing version ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 21:29   Re: beta testing version Hannu Krosing
• 21:48   Re: [SQL] Rules with Conditions: Bug, or Misunderstanding Jan Wieck
• 21:57   Re: beta testing version Jan Wieck
• 21:58   Re: beta testing version Tom Lane
• 22:07   Re: [SQL] Rules with Conditions: Bug, or Misunderstanding Tom Lane
• 22:28   Re: beta testing version Peter Bierman
• 22:51   Re: beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
• 22:53   Re: beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
• 22:55   Re: beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
• 23:04   Re: beta testing version The Hermit Hacker

4 December 2000

• 00:01   Re: beta testing version Ross J. Reedstrom
• 00:24   Re: beta testing version Thomas Lockhart
• 01:01   Re: beta testing version Gary MacDougall
• 01:04   Re: beta testing version Gary MacDougall
• 01:17   Re: beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
• 01:21   Re: beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
• 01:42   Re: beta testing version Ross J. Reedstrom
• 02:02   Re: beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
• 02:16   Re: beta testing version Gary MacDougall
• 02:46   Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5 Billy G. Allie
• 03:13   RI tutorial hack reading needed Joel Burton
• 03:40   Re: beta testing version ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 03:40   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 03:41   Re: beta testing version Tom Lane
• 03:59   postgres docs (was Re: Crash during WAL recovery?) Norman Clarke
• 04:21   Postgresql on dynix/ptx system Radek Fleks
• 04:26   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 04:27   Using Threads? Junfeng Zhang
• 04:41   pg_ident.conf anuradha
• 04:46   RE: 8192 BLCKSZ ?] Andrew Snow
• 04:50   RE: SQL 'in' vs join. Andrew Snow
• 04:52   redundancy and disk i/o Sandeep Joshi
• 04:57   Re: Using Threads? Thomas Lockhart
• 04:57   Re: postgres docs (was Re: Crash during WAL recovery?) Thomas Lockhart
• 13:06   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 13:11   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 13:24   Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5 Tom Lane
• 13:24   Re: beta testing version xuyifeng
• 13:45   Add-on 
• 13:49   Re: Using Threads? Karel Zak
• 14:12   Re: beta testing version Michael Fork
• 14:14   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 14:24   Re: beta testing version Thomas Lockhart
• 14:25   Re: AW: broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte support (F reeBSD 4.1-RELEASE) ? Tom Lane
• 14:30   Re: Using Threads? Myron Scott
• 14:35   Re: beta testing version Ron Chmara
• 14:48   Re: beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
• 15:19   AW: broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte support (F reeBSD 4.1-RELEASE) ? Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 15:37   Bitmap index 
• 15:43   Re: Using Threads? The Hermit Hacker
• 15:45   RE: 8192 BLCKSZ ?] Don Baccus
• 15:51   Re: redundancy and disk i/o Don Baccus
• 15:53   Re: beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
• 15:58   EAN13 for postgresql 
• 16:00   Wrong FOR UPDATE lock type Jan Wieck
• 16:01   triggers and actions tree Fabio Nanni
• 16:05   re : Re: Add-on 
• 16:09   Bitmap index 
• 16:09   Re: beta testing version Vince Vielhaber
• 16:13   Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5 Larry Rosenman
• 16:15   Re: redundancy and disk i/o Dominic J. Eidson
• 16:20   Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5 Dave Smith
• 16:33   RE: Wrong FOR UPDATE lock type Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:42   Re: redundancy and disk i/o Thomas Lockhart
• 16:52   Re: Using Threads? Ross J. Reedstrom
• 17:01   update on compiling postgres on sco Arno A. Karner
• 17:02   Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5 Peter Eisentraut
• 17:10   Re: [SQL] Rules with Conditions: Bug, or Misunderstanding Jan Wieck
• 17:11   AW: AW: broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte suppor t (F reeBSD 4.1-RELEASE) ? Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 17:12   Re: Postgresql on dynix/ptx system Peter Eisentraut
• 17:22   Re: Using Threads? The Hermit Hacker
• 17:39   [Fwd: Re: [CORE] Going Beta on Monday ...] Thomas Lockhart
• 17:45   Re: Wrong FOR UPDATE lock type Jan Wieck
• 18:17   Re: [Fwd: Re: [CORE] Going Beta on Monday ...] Larry Rosenman
• 18:28   Re: beta testing version Don Baccus
• 19:14   Re: beta testing version bpalmer
• 19:15   Re: Wrong FOR UPDATE lock type Tom Lane
• 19:27   Re: Using Threads? Tom Lane
• 19:36   Re: Using Threads? Bruce Guenter
• 19:41   Re: broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte support (FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE) ? Oleg Bartunov
• 19:49   Re: AW: AW: broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte suppor t (F reeBSD 4.1-RELEASE) ? Tom Lane
• 19:49   Re: Using Threads? Junfeng Zhang
• 20:03   Re: postgres docs (was Re: Crash during WAL recovery?) Peter Eisentraut
• 20:03   Debian build failing... Thomas Good
• 20:11   Re: Wrong FOR UPDATE lock type Tom Lane
• 20:12   Re: Using Threads? Adam Haberlach
• 20:24   INSERT INTO ... SELECT problem Alex Perel
• 20:54   Re: Using Threads? Dan Lyke
• 21:09   Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ?] Jan Wieck
• 21:32   Re: Using Threads? Bruce Guenter
• 22:07   RE: Using Threads? Matthew
• 22:20   Re: Using Threads? Bruce Guenter
• 23:21   Re: Using Threads? Lamar Owen

5 December 2000

• 00:02   Re: Bitmap index ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 02:21   Re: Using Threads? Myron Scott
• 02:28   RE: SQL to retrieve FK's, Update/Delete action, etc. (fwd) Michael Fork
• 03:07   Re: Using Threads? Tom Lane
• 03:26   Re: Using Threads? Tom Samplonius
• 03:28   Re: beta testing version Thomas Lockhart
• 03:39   Re: INSERT INTO ... SELECT problem Tom Lane
• 07:11   AW: Using Threads? Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:12   AW: beta testing version Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:00   Re: Re: LOCK Fixes/Break on FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE Alfred Perlstein
• 08:10   Re: Re: LOCK Fixes/Break on FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE Larry Rosenman
• 11:31   Re: EAN13 for postgresql Marko Kreen
• 12:38   RE: SQL to retrieve FK's, Update/Delete action, etc. (fwd) Michael Fork
• 12:49   Spinlocks may be broken. Alfred Perlstein
• 13:14   Re: Re: LOCK Fixes/Break on FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE Tom Lane
• 13:14   Need help with phys backed shm segments (Postgresql+FreeBSD). Alfred Perlstein
• 13:22   Re: Re: LOCK Fixes/Break on FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE Alfred Perlstein
• 13:27   Re: Spinlocks may be broken. Tom Lane
• 13:44   Re: Spinlocks may be broken. Alfred Perlstein
• 13:51   RE: Re: LOCK Fixes/Break on FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE Larry Rosenman
• 13:55   Re: Using Threads? Bruce Guenter
• 13:57   Re: Need help with phys backed shm segments (Postgresql+FreeBSD). Tom Lane
• 14:02   Re: Need help with phys backed shm segments (Postgresql+FreeBSD). Alfred Perlstein
• 14:14   Re: Using Threads? Bruce Guenter
• 14:22   Re: Need help with phys backed shm segments (Postgresql+FreeBSD). Tom Lane
• 14:29   Re: Need help with phys backed shm segments (Postgresql+FreeBSD). Tom Lane
• 15:00   Re: INSERT INTO ... SELECT problem Alex Perel
• 15:45   Re: Using Threads? markw@mohawksoft.com
• 16:07   Re: beta testing version Ross J. Reedstrom
• 16:57   RE: beta testing version Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:04   RE: Wrong FOR UPDATE lock type Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:27   Re: beta testing version Martin A. Marques
• 17:37   Re: beta testing version Martin A. Marques
• 17:55   Re: Using Threads? Tom Lane
• 17:57   RE: beta testing version Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:03   Re: beta testing version Martin A. Marques
• 18:07   Re: Using Threads? Bruce Guenter
• 18:07   Re: Need help with phys backed shm segments (Postgresql+FreeBSD). Alfred Perlstein
• 18:16   RI violation msg suggestion Ed Loehr
• 18:24   Re: beta testing version Martin A. Marques
• 18:30   Re: beta testing version Alfred Perlstein
• 18:53   copy from stdin limits Camm Maguire
• 18:55   Foreign key references to non-primary key columns Camm Maguire
• 19:04   Re: Need help with phys backed shm segments (Postgresql+FreeBSD). Alfred Perlstein
• 19:13   RE: [BUGS] foreign key check makes a big LOCK Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:20   Re: copy from stdin limits Tom Lane
• 19:21   Re: Need help with phys backed shm segments (Postgresql+FreeBSD). Oleg Bartunov
• 19:24   Re: beta testing version ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 19:29   Re: beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
• 19:44   RE: beta testing version Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:47   Re: beta testing version Lamar Owen
• 19:57   Re: Need help with phys backed shm segments (Postgresql+FreeBSD). Randy Jonasz
• 20:03   problem with timestamps ? Mike Haberman
• 20:09   Re: beta testing version Mitch Vincent
• 20:27   Re: Foreign key references to non-primary key columns Stephan Szabo
• 20:27   Re: beta testing version Martin A. Marques
• 20:47   Re: Sorry Alfred Perlstein
• 20:53   Re: Need help with phys backed shm segments (Postgresql+FreeBSD). Alfred Perlstein
• 20:57   Sorry Randy Jonasz
• 21:29   Re: beta testing version Lamar Owen
• 21:46   Re: beta testing version teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind GlomsrØd)
• 22:31   Re: beta testing version (not really anymore ;) Hannu Krosing
• 22:49   Re: beta testing version Lamar Owen
• 23:18   How to reset WAL enveironment Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:43   RE: How to reset WAL enveironment Mikheev, Vadim

6 December 2000

• 00:30   Re: How to reset WAL enveironment Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:34   Re: problem with timestamps ? Thomas Lockhart
• 02:49   Strange messages in log. Denis Perchine
• 03:08   RE: How to reset WAL enveironment Mikheev, Vadim
• 06:07   Re: [GENERAL] RE: Indexing for geographic objects? Bernard Frankpitt
• 07:52   Re: How to reset WAL enveironment Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:08   Function returning tuples. mlw
• 09:30   RE: Indexing for geographic objects? Edmar Wiggers
• 10:16   AW: beta testing version Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 11:07   BLOB Help! Felix Lungu
• 13:04   CAST ON NEW TYPE 
• 13:07   Re: Foreign key references to non-primary key columns Camm Maguire
• 13:36   Re: CAST ON NEW TYPE Tom Lane
• 13:37   Re: CAST ON NEW TYPE Thomas Lockhart
• 14:15   Re: AW: beta testing version Tom Lane
• 14:17   CVS: miscadmin.h is missing Oleg Bartunov
• 14:38   Re: AW: beta testing version Daniele Orlandi
• 15:20   Re: CVS: miscadmin.h is missing Tom Lane
• 16:25   Re: AW: beta testing version Bruce Guenter
• 21:29   CRCs (was: beta testing version) ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 21:49   RE: Logging for sequences Mikheev, Vadim
• 22:16   COPY BINARY file format proposal Tom Lane
• 22:23   CRCs (was: beta testing version) ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 22:49   RFC C++ Interface Randy Jonasz
• 22:50   Re: CVS: miscadmin.h is missing Oleg Bartunov
• 22:57   Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Tom Lane
• 23:10   Re: Logging for sequences Tom Lane
• 23:14   Re: AW: beta testing version Daniele Orlandi

7 December 2000

• 00:36   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Tom Lane
• 00:41   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Philip Warner
• 00:45   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Tom Lane
• 00:46   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Philip Warner
• 00:48   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Philip Warner
• 00:50   Re: RFC C++ Interface ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 00:53   Re: AW: beta testing version Bruce Guenter
• 00:56   Re: CRCs (was: beta testing version) Bruce Guenter
• 01:06   RE: AW: beta testing version Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:19   HeapTuple? mlw
• 01:19   RE: AW: beta testing version Mikheev, Vadim
• 02:05   RE: beta testing version Mikheev, Vadim
• 02:36   Re: beta testing version Tom Lane
• 03:06   Re: HeapTuple? Tom Lane
• 03:06   Re: beta testing version Tom Lane
• 03:08   Re: A mb problem in PostgreSQL Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:45   CRC was: Re: beta testing version Horst Herb
• 07:06   pre-beta is slow xuyifeng
• 08:07   BUG WITH CREATE FUNCTION....... 
• 08:37   Re: CRC was: Re: beta testing version Hannu Krosing
• 11:06   ECPG todo Michael Meskes
• 13:38   Re: [DOCS] organization file Thomas Lockhart
• 14:09   Re: RFC C++ Interface Peter Eisentraut
• 14:31   Re: copy from stdin limits Camm Maguire
• 15:43   Re: copy from stdin limits Tom Lane
• 15:43   Re: RFC C++ Interface Randy Jonasz
• 15:45   Re: RFC C++ Interface Randy Jonasz
• 17:05   Switch pg_ctl's default about waiting? Tom Lane
• 17:28   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Tom Lane
• 17:48   v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... The Hermit Hacker
• 18:06   Re: BUG WITH CREATE FUNCTION....... Tom Lane
• 18:06   Re: CRC was: Re: beta testing version ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 18:09   RE: beta testing version Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:10   Oracle-compatible lpad/rpad behavior Tom Lane
• 18:20   RE: Switch pg_ctl's default about waiting? Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:26   Re: CRCs (was: beta testing version) ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 18:34   Re: beta testing version Tom Lane
• 18:34   RE: pre-beta is slow Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:36   Re: v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Martin A. Marques
• 18:40   RE: CRC was: Re: beta testing version Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:50   RE: CRCs (was: beta testing version) Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:06   Re: v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Tom Lane
• 19:06   RE: How to reset WAL enveironment Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:09   Re: Switch pg_ctl's default about waiting? Peter Eisentraut
• 19:29   Re: v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Peter Eisentraut
• 19:36   Re: CRCs (was: beta testing version) Horst Herb
• 19:37   Re: CRCs (was: beta testing version) Horst Herb
• 19:43   Re: Switch pg_ctl's default about waiting? Tom Lane
• 19:45   Re: CRC was: Re: beta testing version Tom Lane
• 19:54   Re: v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Tom Lane
• 20:06   Re: CRCs (was: beta testing version) Bruce Guenter
• 20:24   Re: v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Martin A. Marques
• 20:36   Re: CRCs (was: beta testing version) Bruce Guenter
• 21:24   Patches with vacuum fixes available for 7.0.x Alfred Perlstein
• 21:32   Re: CRCs (was: beta testing version) ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 21:35   abstract: fix poor constant folding in 7.0.x, fixed in 7.1? Alfred Perlstein
• 22:01   Re: CRC was: Re: beta testing version ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 22:15   Re: abstract: fix poor constant folding in 7.0.x, fixed in 7.1? Joel Burton
• 22:25   Re: v7.1 beta 1 (ODBC driver?) Joel Burton
• 22:25   Re: v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... The Hermit Hacker
• 22:26   Re: How to reset WAL enveironment Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:37   Re: CRC was: Re: beta testing version Tom Lane
• 22:37   Re: abstract: fix poor constant folding in 7.0.x, fixed in 7.1? Tom Lane
• 22:51   Re: abstract: fix poor constant folding in 7.0.x, fixed in 7.1? Alfred Perlstein
• 22:53   Re: v7.1 beta 1 (ODBC driver?) The Hermit Hacker
• 23:01   Re: Patches with vacuum fixes available for 7.0.x Tom Lane
• 23:13   Re: abstract: fix poor constant folding in 7.0.x, fixed in 7.1? Alfred Perlstein
• 23:19   Re: Patches with vacuum fixes available for 7.0.x Alfred Perlstein
• 23:58   Re: abstract: fix poor constant folding in 7.0.x, fixed in 7.1? Tom Lane

8 December 2000

• 01:07   Re: Patches with vacuum fixes available for 7.0.x Tom Samplonius
• 01:07   Re: Patches with vacuum fixes available for 7.0.x Alfred Perlstein
• 01:43   Re: Re: Sorry Dan Moschuk
• 02:34   Re: Re: Sorry Dan Moschuk
• 02:36   Re: v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Thomas Lockhart
• 03:47   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Philip Warner
• 03:57   Re: v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Tom Lane
• 04:25   Re: v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Thomas Lockhart
• 04:29   Re: v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Tom Lane
• 05:31   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Tom Lane
• 05:47   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Tom Lane
• 06:05   RFC: CRC datatype Horst Herb
• 06:17   RE: RFC: CRC datatype Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 09:19   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Philip Warner
• 11:01   Re: RFC: CRC datatype Horst Herb
• 12:36   Re: pre-beta is slow Hannu Krosing
• 13:21   Re: Indexing for geographic objects? Oleg Bartunov
• 13:50   Re: Indexing for geographic objects? Tom Lane
• 14:08   OK, does anyone have any better ideas? mlw
• 14:21   Re: Indexing for geographic objects? The Hermit Hacker
• 14:48   Re: RFC: CRC datatype Tom Lane
• 15:17   Re: RFC: CRC datatype Horst Herb
• 15:21   Trip to Japan Bruce Momjian
• 15:38   OSDN database summit Bruce Momjian
• 15:42   Re: Indexing for geographic objects? Oleg Bartunov
• 15:57   Re: Indexing for geographic objects? Oleg Bartunov
• 15:57   Re: Trip to Japan Bruce Momjian
• 16:06   Re: Indexing for geographic objects? Tom Lane
• 16:06   Re: Indexing for geographic objects? The Hermit Hacker
• 16:09   Re: Trip to Japan Oleg Bartunov
• 16:19   Re: CRC was: Re: beta testing version Bruce Guenter
• 16:19   Re: Threads Fabrizio Manfredi
• 16:37   Re: CRC was: Re: beta testing version Ian Lance Taylor
• 16:37   Re: RFC: CRC datatype Tom Lane
• 16:49   RE: pre-beta is slow Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:03   Re: CRC was: Re: beta testing version Bruce Guenter
• 17:18   Re: pre-beta is slow Tom Lane
• 17:19   Re: CRC was: Re: beta testing version Bruce Guenter
• 17:19   Re: Indexing for geographic objects? Oleg Bartunov
• 17:30   RE: pre-beta is slow Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:39   RE: pre-beta is slow Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:41   Re: CRC ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 17:51   Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? Tom Lane
• 17:51   Re: CRC was: Re: beta testing version Tom Lane
• 17:55   Re: AW: beta testing version Daniele Orlandi
• 18:38   Re: CRC was: Re: beta testing version Tom Lane
• 18:48   RE: pre-beta is slow Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:06   Re: pre-beta is slow Tom Lane
• 19:06   Re: Re: CRC ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 19:06   Re: Re: CRC Bruce Guenter
• 19:21   Re: Re: CRC Tom Lane
• 19:32   Re: Re: CRC Tom Lane
• 19:37   Hash index on macaddr -> crash Tom Lane
• 19:40   Re: Re: CRC Bruce Guenter
• 19:53   Re: CRC was: Re: beta testing version Bruce Guenter
• 20:02   RE: Hash index on macaddr -> crash Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:08   RE: Hash index on macaddr -> crash Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:09   RE: Hash index on macaddr -> crash Darren King
• 20:14   Re: Re: CRC Bruce Guenter
• 20:18   European Datestyle Daniele Orlandi
• 20:33   Re: Hash index on macaddr -> crash Tom Lane
• 20:45   Re: European Datestyle teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind GlomsrØd)
• 21:06   Re: Re: CRC Tom Lane
• 21:17   7.0.3(nofsync) vs 7.1 Mikheev, Vadim
• 21:52   Re: Hash index on macaddr -> crash Tom Lane
• 22:18   Re: 7.0.3(nofsync) vs 7.1 Tom Lane
• 22:42   Bug in index scans with Locale support enabled Barry Lind
• 22:47   Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? mlw
• 23:07   Re: Bug in index scans with Locale support enabled Tom Lane
• 23:15   Re: A mb problem in PostgreSQL Chih-Chang Hsieh
• 23:17   Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? mlw
• 23:27   RE: 7.0.3(nofsync) vs 7.1 Mikheev, Vadim
• 23:29   Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? Tom Lane
• 23:34   Re: 7.0.3(nofsync) vs 7.1 Tom Lane
• 23:38   Re: Trip to Japan Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:53   RE: 7.0.3(nofsync) vs 7.1 Mikheev, Vadim

9 December 2000

• 00:06   Re: 7.0.3(nofsync) vs 7.1 Tom Lane
• 00:06   Japan pictures Bruce Momjian
• 00:11   Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? Andrew Snow
• 00:36   Re: European Datestyle Daniele Orlandi
• 00:36   Re: Re: CRC Tom Lane
• 00:37   Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? mlw
• 00:57   CRC, hash & Co. Horst Herb
• 01:09   Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? mlw
• 01:18   Re: Re: CRC Tom Lane
• 01:24   Re: Indexing for geographic objects? selkovjr@mcs.anl.gov
• 02:05   Re: Re: A mb problem in PostgreSQL Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:19   Re: [GENERAL] Japan pictures Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:27   Re: Re: A mb problem in PostgreSQL Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:19   Re: Using Threads? Bruce Momjian
• 03:20   Re: Using Threads? Bruce Momjian
• 03:22   Re: Using Threads? Bruce Momjian
• 03:26   Re: Using Threads? Bruce Momjian
• 03:36   Re: Using Threads? Bruce Momjian
• 03:59   Re: Re: CRC Bruce Guenter
• 04:01   Re: Using Threads? Tom Lane
• 04:52   Re: European Datestyle Thomas Lockhart
• 05:39   Re: 7.0.3(nofsync) vs 7.1 Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:47   Re: [GENERAL] Japan pictures Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:14   Re: 7.0.3(nofsync) vs 7.1 Philip Warner
• 07:19   Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? Oleg Bartunov
• 10:41   ... Oleg Bartunov
• 11:18   Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? mlw
• 11:23   RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c) Hiroshi Inoue
• 11:36   RE: Japan pictures Hiroshi Inoue
• 11:43   Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? Oleg Bartunov
• 12:29   Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? mlw
• 13:19   Re: Using Threads? Bruce Momjian
• 13:46   Re: Tom Lane
• 13:56   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c) Tom Lane
• 14:04   Re: Oleg Bartunov
• 14:23   RE: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? Edmar Wiggers
• 14:35   RE: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? Oleg Bartunov
• 15:06   Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? Tom Lane
• 18:04   Re: F_SETLK is looking worse and worse... Bruce Momjian
• 20:31   Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? mlw
• 21:26   RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c) Hiroshi Inoue
• 21:49   Re: Re: CRC Tom Lane
• 21:58   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c) Tom Lane

10 December 2000

• 03:38   Re: Re: CRC Bruce Guenter
• 04:25   Re: Re: CRC Bruce Guenter
• 04:35   Re: CRC, hash & Co. Bruce Guenter
• 04:51   Strange behavior of PostgreSQL on Linux Denis Perchine
• 05:27   Re: Re: CRC ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 10:32   Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? Hannu Krosing
• 11:49   RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c) Hiroshi Inoue
• 15:38   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c) Tom Lane
• 16:04   Re: F_SETLK is looking worse and worse... Peter Eisentraut
• 16:10   Unknown-type resolution rules, redux Tom Lane
• 16:21   Re: Strange behavior of PostgreSQL on Linux Tom Lane
• 16:35   Re: v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Peter Eisentraut
• 17:02   Re: SQL 'in' vs join. Tom Lane
• 17:08   Re: SQL 'in' vs join. Bruce Momjian
• 17:36   Re: Re: CRC Tom Lane
• 17:54   Re: Re: CRC Tom Lane
• 18:49   Re: memory management suggestion Bruce Momjian
• 18:51   Re: Re: CRC Alfred Perlstein
• 18:56   Re: COPY BINARY is broken... Bruce Momjian
• 19:33   Functions returning sets, last one I promise! mlw
• 19:37   Re: Re: CRC Bruce Guenter
• 19:39   Re: Re: CRC Bruce Guenter
• 19:57   Re: Bug in index scans with Locale support enabled Peter Eisentraut
• 20:12   Re: [Fwd: Re: [CORE] Going Beta on Monday ...] Bruce Momjian
• 20:27   Re: memory management suggestion Tom Lane
• 20:41   Re: COPY BINARY is broken... Tom Lane
• 21:49   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Bruce Momjian
• 21:50   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Bruce Momjian
• 21:53   Re: RFC C++ Interface Bruce Momjian
• 22:08   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c) Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:10   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c) Tom Lane
• 22:36   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 23:08   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Ross J. Reedstrom
• 23:45   Re: 7.0.3(nofsync) vs 7.1 Bruce Momjian
• 23:53   7.1 features list Bruce Momjian
• 23:54   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Tom Lane

11 December 2000

• 00:09   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Bruce Momjian
• 01:09   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c) Hiroshi Inoue
• 11:55   Fwd: Re: CRC, hash & Co. Horst Herb
• 12:01   Re: v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... The Hermit Hacker
• 12:14   AW: Using Threads? Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 12:17   AW: Using Threads? Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 12:38   AW: Oracle-compatible lpad/rpad behavior Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 12:48   Re: Re: CRC Erich
• 13:07   Re: v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Thomas Lockhart
• 13:16   Re: Re: CRC Thomas Lockhart
• 14:08   suggest remove of elog in xlog.c Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:43   Re: AW: Oracle-compatible lpad/rpad behavior Tom Lane
• 15:38   Is VACUUM still crash-safe? Tom Lane
• 15:54   Re: v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Peter Eisentraut
• 16:04   Great Bridge PostgreSQL products and services Ned Lilly
• 16:45   Re: Re: CRC Bruce Guenter
• 16:46   RE: Is VACUUM still crash-safe? Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:47   RE: Is VACUUM still crash-safe? Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:56   RE: Re: CRC Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:02   Re: RFC C++ Interface Adriaan Joubert
• 17:10   RE: suggest remove of elog in xlog.c Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:20   Re: Is VACUUM still crash-safe? Tom Lane
• 17:34   Re: Unknown-type resolution rules, redux Thomas Lockhart
• 18:39   (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available. Alfred Perlstein
• 18:45   RPM changes for 7.1. Lamar Owen
• 18:58   Re: Re: CRC Bruce Guenter
• 19:22   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available. Bruce Momjian
• 19:33   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available. Tom Lane
• 19:56   Re: RPM changes for 7.1. Ross J. Reedstrom
• 20:00   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available. Bruce Momjian
• 20:21   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available. The Hermit Hacker
• 20:21   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available. The Hermit Hacker
• 22:00   Re: Is VACUUM still crash-safe? Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:21   RE: Is VACUUM still crash-safe? Mikheev, Vadim
• 22:29   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available. Alfred Perlstein
• 22:47   RE: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . Mikheev, Vadim
• 23:13   RE: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . The Hermit Hacker
• 23:33   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . Bruce Momjian
• 23:37   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . The Hermit Hacker
• 23:46   Re: Is VACUUM still crash-safe? Tom Lane

12 December 2000

• 00:01   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . Bruce Momjian
• 00:24   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . Tom Lane
• 00:24   SourceForge & Postgres Tim Perdue
• 00:44   Re: SourceForge & Postgres mlw
• 00:45   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . The Hermit Hacker
• 01:11   Re: RFC C++ Interface Thomas Lockhart
• 01:22   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . Bruce Momjian
• 01:27   Re: SourceForge & Postgres Bruce Momjian
• 01:53   Re: SourceForge & Postgres mlw
• 01:56   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . Tom Lane
• 02:06   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . Tom Lane
• 02:11   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . Andrew Snow
• 02:13   Re: Is VACUUM still crash-safe? Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:19   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . The Hermit Hacker
• 02:20   Re: SourceForge & Postgres Tom Lane
• 02:24   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . Bruce Momjian
• 02:30   Re: SourceForge & Postgres Tom Lane
• 02:31   Re: SourceForge & Postgres The Hermit Hacker
• 02:31   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . Tom Lane
• 02:50   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . The Hermit Hacker
• 03:37   Re: SourceForge & Postgres Tim Perdue
• 04:20   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . Alfred Perlstein
• 06:33   AW: SourceForge & Postgres Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 10:16   Re: SourceForge & Postgres mlw
• 10:59   AW: SourceForge & Postgres (attdispursion) Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 11:42   RE: Indexing for geographic objects? Edmar Wiggers
• 12:41   HELP! foreign eys & inheritance Horst Herb
• 12:55   Re: AW: SourceForge & Postgres (attdispursion) Bruce Momjian
• 13:03   Re: RPM changes for 7.1. Oliver Elphick
• 13:07   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Philip Warner
• 13:09   shared libs on sco how? Arno A. Karner
• 13:42   Oracle-compatible lpad/rpad behavior Paul
• 14:12   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Philip Warner
• 14:13   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Tom Lane
• 14:17   Re: [GENERAL] Oracle-compatible lpad/rpad behavior Jonathan Ellis
• 14:18   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Tom Lane
• 14:30   Fwd: Re: HELP! foreign eys & inheritance Horst Herb
• 14:36   Re:Postgresql on dynix/ptx system Barry Jenner
• 15:10   Re: CRC, hash & Co. Horst Herb
• 15:16   external function proposal for 7.2 mlw
• 15:22   No postgres on Solaris Martin A. Marques
• 15:28   Bug in FOREIGN KEY Bruce Momjian
• 15:34   AW: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 15:45   Re: shared libs on sco how? Peter Eisentraut
• 15:51   Re: Re: [GENERAL] Oracle-compatible lpad/rpad behavior Hannu Krosing
• 16:19   Re: Fwd: Re: HELP! foreign eys & inheritance Stephan Szabo
• 16:55   RE: 7.0.3(nofsync) vs 7.1 Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:00   Re: [GENERAL] No postgres on Solaris Chris Jones
• 17:39   Re: RFC C++ Interface Randy Jonasz
• 19:15   Re: CRC was: Re: beta testing version ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 19:29   Re: RFC: CRC datatype ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 19:58   Re: SourceForge & Postgres Tom Lane
• 20:20   Re: RFC C++ Interface ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:33   Re: RFC C++ Interface Bruce Momjian
• 20:44   Need help with redefining locales Hannu Krosing
• 21:03   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 22:01   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 22:21   Re: SourceForge & Postgres mlw
• 22:29   Re: RFC C++ Interface ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 23:09   Re: external function proposal for 7.2 mlw
• 23:43   Need help with redefining locales Hannu Krosing
• 23:45   Re: external function proposal for 7.2 Vincent AE Scott

13 December 2000

• 03:10   Creating a 'SET' type Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:17   Re: RFC: CRC datatype Horst Herb
• 03:20   Re: external function proposal for 7.2 Tom Lane
• 03:26   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Tom Lane
• 03:33   C function proposal redux mlw
• 05:36   Bug in ILIKE function? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 06:03   Re: C function proposal redux Karel Zak
• 06:58   Re: Bug in ILIKE function? Hannu Krosing
• 07:35   triggers and actions tree/2 Fabio Nanni
• 08:18   AW: SourceForge & Postgres Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:06   Locale and multibyte support in 7.1 tolik@aaanet.ru (Anatoly K. Lasareff)
• 09:47   Re: Locale and multibyte support in 7.1 Oleg Bartunov
• 10:27   PLEASE help with foreign key and inheritance problem Horst Herb
• 10:59   AW: PLEASE help with foreign key and inheritance proble m Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 11:11   Re: external function proposal for 7.2 mlw
• 11:54   left join bug? Max Khon
• 12:49   AW: AW: PLEASE help with foreign key and inheritance pr oble m Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 13:23   Re: external function proposal for 7.2 mlw
• 13:26   left join bug? (fwd) Max Khon
• 16:19   Re: 7.0.3(nofsync) vs 7.1 Jan Wieck
• 16:26   index support for arrays (GiST) Oleg Bartunov
• 16:58   Re: Creating a 'SET' type Tom Lane
• 17:16   Re: [GENERAL] No postgres on Solaris Peter Eisentraut
• 17:17   Writing essay, please help! DÅ
• 17:23   Re: left join bug? Tom Lane
• 17:26   Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Peter Eisentraut
• 17:30   Re: [GENERAL] No postgres on Solaris Martin A. Marques
• 17:36   DB Algorithm Essay, please help DÅ
• 17:48   DB-Manager Algorithms Essay. Please help! DÅ
• 18:01   Re: Bug in ILIKE function? Peter Eisentraut
• 18:07   Re: Bug in FOREIGN KEY Peter Eisentraut
• 18:07   Problem when deleting a record from a table Luis Sousa
• 18:15   Re: RFC C++ Interface Randy Jonasz
• 19:53   docs Martin A. Marques
• 20:01   Re: DB Algorithm Essay, please help Robert B. Easter
• 20:21   Re: RFC C++ Interface ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:38   Re: external function proposal for 7.2 Hannu Krosing
• 20:46   Re: external function proposal for 7.2 Vincent AE Scott
• 20:57   Why vacuum? bpalmer
• 20:57   How to import/export data from/to an ASCII file? Raymond Chui
• 21:00   Re: [GENERAL] No postgres on Solaris oberpwd@anubis.network.com (Wade D. Oberpriller)
• 21:08   Re: external function proposal for 7.2 mlw
• 21:12   Re: Why vacuum? Martin A. Marques
• 21:16   Idea for reducing planning time Tom Lane
• 21:42   Re: Why vacuum? Alfred Perlstein
• 21:49   Re: Why vacuum? Daniele Orlandi
• 21:54   Re: left join bug? Tom Lane
• 22:00   (Updated) Table File Format Michael Richards
• 22:04   Re: Idea for reducing planning time Alfred Perlstein
• 22:22   Re: Idea for reducing planning time The Hermit Hacker
• 22:30   RE: 7.0.3(nofsync) vs 7.1 Mikheev, Vadim
• 22:32   Table File Format Michael Richards
• 22:46   Re: Idea for reducing planning time Tom Lane
• 23:00   Beta1 starting date? Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:00   pg_options.sample Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:14   RE: Bug in ILIKE function? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 23:34   Re: RFC C++ Interface Randy Jonasz
• 23:36   Re: Beta1 starting date? The Hermit Hacker
• 23:43   Re: Why vacuum? xuyifeng

14 December 2000

• 00:32   Re: pg_options.sample Tom Lane
• 00:35   Re: Bug in ILIKE function? Tom Lane
• 00:52   Re: Why vacuum? xuyifeng
• 01:09   Re: Why vacuum? Alfred Perlstein
• 01:44   Re: Why vacuum? bpalmer
• 01:48   Re: Why vacuum? The Hermit Hacker
• 01:49   RE: Why vacuum? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:58   RE: Why vacuum? Tim Allen
• 02:19   Re: Bug in FOREIGN KEY Bruce Momjian
• 03:04   Re: pg_options.sample Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:44   Re: (Updated) Table File Format Tom Lane
• 05:38   vacuum crash on 6.5.3 Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:32   Re: Why vacuum? Andrew McMillan
• 08:55   Thanks! Philip Hofstetter
• 09:11   Re: (Updated) Table File Format Hannu Krosing
• 09:13   AW: Why vacuum? Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:16   Re: Why vacuum? Hannu Krosing
• 09:56   Re: Why vacuum? Denis Perchine
• 10:14   Re: Why vacuum? Martin A. Marques
• 11:38   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL v.7.0.2 for Windows 98,2000,NT Chris Ian Capon Fiel
• 11:47   Re: PostgreSQL for Windows 98, 2000, NT Chris Ian Capon Fiel
• 12:09   vacuum verbose analyze lazy problem. Denis Perchine
• 13:14   Re: Bug in FOREIGN KEY Jan Wieck
• 13:44   Ocasional problems !!!! Luis Sousa
• 13:45   fs full stops postmaster Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 13:49   AW: fs full stops postmaster Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 13:52   Re: Ocasional problems !!!! Thomas Lockhart
• 13:54   Re: (Updated) Table File Format Michael Richards
• 13:57   Re: Why vacuum? Ross J. Reedstrom
• 14:13   Re: Why vacuum? Daniele Orlandi
• 14:13   Re: Why vacuum? Ross J. Reedstrom
• 14:15   switching txlog file in 7.1beta Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:23   Re: Why vacuum? Daniele Orlandi
• 14:24   Re: Why vacuum? Alfred Perlstein
• 14:39   AW: Why vacuum? Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:56   Re: vacuum verbose analyze lazy problem. Vadim Mikheev
• 15:01   Re: switching txlog file in 7.1beta Vadim Mikheev
• 15:04   Re: AW: Why vacuum? Daniele Orlandi
• 15:14   Re: Why vacuum? Alfred Perlstein
• 15:28   Re: Why vacuum? mlw
• 15:42   Re: Why vacuum? Alfred Perlstein
• 16:03   Re: Why vacuum? Daniele Orlandi
• 16:08   Re: Ocasional problems !!!! Stephan Szabo
• 19:08   CRC-64 ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)

15 December 2000

• 02:13   Re: How to import/export data from/to an ASCII file? Josh Rovero
• 02:23   create trigger : functions Sandeep Joshi
• 05:15   Re: vacuum verbose analyze lazy problem. Denis Perchine
• 07:04   AW: AW: Why vacuum? Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:32   Re: Ocasional problems !!!! Luis Sousa
• 07:45   Re: Ocasional problems !!!! Luis Sousa
• 09:03   AW: switching txlog file in 7.1beta Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:42   heap page corruption not easy Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 10:10   Re: index support for arrays (GiST) Oleg Bartunov
• 13:24   Re: index support for arrays (GiST) Thomas Lockhart
• 13:33   Re: (Updated) Table File Format Hannu Krosing
• 13:38   BLCKSZ:Max tuple size problem Nick Wayne
• 13:39   Trigger Manika dey
• 15:37   Re: Beta1 starting date? Lamar Owen
• 15:55   Re: Ocasional problems !!!! Tom Lane
• 16:02   Re: BLCKSZ:Max tuple size problem Tom Lane
• 16:30   Re: Ocasional problems !!!! Stephan Szabo
• 16:43   Re: switching txlog file in 7.1beta Vadim Mikheev
• 17:20   Re: index support for arrays (GiST) Oleg Bartunov
• 17:34   Re: Idea for reducing planning time Bruce Momjian
• 17:54   Re: Idea for reducing planning time Tom Lane
• 18:03   7.1 (current) unwanted NOT NULL constraint inserted Oliver Elphick
• 18:04   Re: Idea for reducing planning time Marc G. Fournier
• 18:04   Re: Idea for reducing planning time Bruce Momjian
• 18:15   TOAST-table vacuuming (was Re: Idea for reducing planning time) Tom Lane
• 18:15   RE: Idea for reducing planning time Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:15   Re: Idea for reducing planning time Bruce Momjian
• 18:19   Re: Idea for reducing planning time Tom Lane
• 18:20   7.1 (current) unwanted NOT NULL constraint inserted (more) Oliver Elphick
• 18:22   Re: Idea for reducing planning time Tom Lane
• 18:26   Re: Idea for reducing planning time Alfred Perlstein
• 18:30   RE: TOAST-table vacuuming (was Re: Idea for reducing pl anning time) Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:33   Re: Idea for reducing planning time Bruce Momjian
• 18:38   Re: Idea for reducing planning time Bruce Momjian
• 18:39   RE: Idea for reducing planning time Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:41   Re: 7.1 (current) unwanted NOT NULL constraint inserted Tom Lane
• 19:33   Cleaning up backend-exit cleanup Tom Lane
• 19:38   Re: Idea for reducing planning time ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:03   Re: 7.1 (current) unwanted NOT NULL constraint inserted Tom Lane
• 20:44   Re: TOAST-table vacuuming (was Re: Idea for reducing pl anning time) Tom Lane
• 20:47   CURRENT/OLD keywords still broken Peter Eisentraut
• 20:58   Re: CURRENT/OLD keywords still broken Bruce Momjian
• 21:04   RE: TOAST-table vacuuming (was Re: Idea for reducing pl anning time) Mikheev, Vadim
• 21:07   RE: TOAST-table vacuuming (was Re: Idea for reducing pl anning time) Mikheev, Vadim
• 21:09   Views as FROM subselects Bruce Momjian
• 21:10   Re: Views as FROM subselects Tom Lane
• 21:13   Re: CURRENT/OLD keywords still broken Tom Lane
• 21:15   Re: TOAST-table vacuuming (was Re: Idea for reducing pl anning time) Tom Lane
• 21:19   Re: CURRENT/OLD keywords still broken Tom Lane
• 21:31   Re: 7.1 (current) unwanted NOT NULL constraint inserted Oliver Elphick
• 21:32   Re: CURRENT/OLD keywords still broken Peter Eisentraut
• 21:36   Re: CURRENT/OLD keywords still broken Bruce Momjian
• 21:51   TOAST documentation mike
• 22:00   anoncvs's lock Peter Eisentraut
• 23:32   PostgreSQL, Inc. Open Letter to the PostgreSQL Global Development Project Geoff Davidson

16 December 2000

• 01:24   Re: TOAST documentation Tom Lane
• 02:40   Digest subscription Patrick Dunford
• 04:39   Table name scope (was Re: [BUGS] Outer joins aren't working with views) Tom Lane
• 05:17   Re: Table name scope (was Re: [BUGS] Outer joins aren't working with views) Thomas Lockhart
• 14:53   Co-Location Rod Taylor
• 15:04   locking bug? Max Khon
• 15:46   Re: Table name scope (was Re: [BUGS] Outer joins aren't working with views) Tom Lane
• 15:57   Re: Co-Location Tom Lane
• 16:17   Re: shared libs on sco how? Peter Eisentraut
• 17:32   Tuple data Michael Richards
• 17:57   Re: Tuple data Tom Lane
• 18:11   Re: Tuple data Hannu Krosing
• 18:13   Re: Tuple data Michael Richards
• 18:16   7.1 features list Bruce Momjian
• 18:24   Re: Tuple data Hannu Krosing
• 18:29   Re: Tuple data Michael Richards
• 18:29   Re: Tuple data Tom Lane
• 18:35   Re: 7.1 features list Oleg Bartunov
• 19:59   Redundant code in oper_select_candidate() Tom Lane
• 23:22   Re: 7.1 features list Peter Bierman

17 December 2000

• 00:07   Re: locking bug? Stephan Szabo
• 00:23   Re: Tuple data Tom Lane
• 00:46   Re: 7.1 features list Tom Lane
• 04:09   Re: Table name scope (was Re: [BUGS] Outer joins aren't working with views) Thomas Lockhart
• 04:44   Re: Table name scope (was Re: [BUGS] Outer joins aren't working with views) Tom Lane
• 05:26   Re: Table name scope (was Re: [BUGS] Outer joins aren't working with views) Thomas Lockhart
• 15:40   More Tuple Madness Michael Richards
• 16:05   Re: Table name scope (was Re: [BUGS] Outer joins aren't working with views) Tom Lane
• 16:14   Re: More Tuple Madness Tom Lane
• 16:18   pg_dumpall --accounts-only Peter Eisentraut
• 16:33   Re: More Tuple Madness Michael Richards
• 16:34   Re: Table name scope (was Re: [BUGS] Outer joins aren't working with views) Tom Lane
• 16:36   Re: More Tuple Madness Tom Lane
• 16:39   Re: pg_dumpall --accounts-only Tom Lane
• 18:07   Manual changes for ALTER TABLE OWNER Bruce Momjian
• 18:48   Re: Attribute Alignment Michael Richards
• 19:08   Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Oleg Bartunov
• 20:29   Re: Tuple data Hannu Krosing
• 20:45   Re: Attribute Alignment Tom Lane
• 20:53   Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Tom Lane
• 21:02   Re: Attribute Alignment Michael Richards
• 22:09   Re: Tuple data Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:41   Re: TOAST-table vacuuming (was Re: Idea for reducing planning time) Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:05   Re: Tuple data Tom Lane
• 23:36   Re: Tuple data Michael Richards
• 23:45   Re: 7.1 features list The Hermit Hacker
• 23:58   Re: Tuple data Tom Lane
• 23:58   Re: Table name scope (was Re: [BUGS] Outer joins aren't working with views) Thomas Lockhart

18 December 2000

• 00:12   Re: 7.1 features list Peter Bierman
• 00:22   Re: Tuple data Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:22   Re: Tuple data Michael Richards
• 00:41   Re: Tuple data Robert B. Easter
• 01:47   Re: [SQL] PostgreSQL crashes on me :( Tom Lane
• 01:49   How to assign a new admin account name and password for 7.02? Roger Smith
• 02:04   TOAST documentation mike
• 02:12   Re: 7.1 features list Bruce Momjian
• 02:17   Re: 7.1 features list Bruce Momjian
• 02:23   Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Bruce Momjian
• 02:30   Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Tom Lane
• 05:06   Re: Re: [SQL] PostgreSQL crashes on me :( ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 05:37   Re: Trigger Karel Zak
• 07:16   Re: Ocasional problems !!!! Luis Sousa
• 08:00   heap page corruption not easy Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 13:30   Re: Tuple data Tom Lane
• 13:41   Re: Re: [SQL] PostgreSQL crashes on me :( Tom Lane
• 15:20   Re: Ocasional problems !!!! Stephan Szabo
• 15:33   Re: Re: [SQL] PostgreSQL crashes on me :( Ian Lance Taylor
• 15:40   Re: Re: [SQL] PostgreSQL crashes on me :( Tom Lane
• 15:57   Re: Re: [SQL] PostgreSQL crashes on me :( Ian Lance Taylor
• 16:03   Re: [DOCS] Re: 7.1 features list Tom Lane
• 16:18   Re: Re: [SQL] PostgreSQL crashes on me :( Tom Lane
• 16:40   Re: Re: [SQL] PostgreSQL crashes on me :( Ian Lance Taylor
• 16:42   Re: Beos update Bruce Momjian
• 17:08   Re: Re: [SQL] PostgreSQL crashes on me :( Tom Lane
• 17:12   Re: [DOCS] Re: 7.1 features list The Hermit Hacker
• 18:16   Re: Re: [SQL] PostgreSQL crashes on me :( Tom Lane
• 18:50   Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Oleg Bartunov
• 19:10   Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Tom Lane
• 20:26   RE: heap page corruption not easy Mikheev, Vadim
• 22:07   Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Hannu Krosing
• 22:26   Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Tom Lane
• 22:57   Re: heap page corruption not easy Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:59   Re: [DOCS] 7.1 features list Ryan Kirkpatrick

19 December 2000

• 04:39   performance modality in 7.1 for large text attributes? Paul A Vixie
• 04:39   LM devel GLIB2_2 vs
• 04:45   Re: Tuple data Emmanuel Charpentier,,,
• 05:04   Re: Re: Beos update Thomas Lockhart
• 05:20   OID Implicit limit Steve Howe
• 06:15   AW: heap page corruption not easy Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 12:00   Re: Re: [SQL] PostgreSQL crashes on me :( Mathijs Brands
• 13:13   Re: performance modality in 7.1 for large text attributes? Thomas Lockhart
• 13:14   Re: performance modality in 7.1 for large text attributes? Alex Pilosov
• 13:32   libpq enhancement for multi-process application Sébastien Bonnet
• 13:42   Isn't init_irels() dangerous ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 13:42   Is PQreset() proper ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 14:09   Re: libpq enhancement for multi-process application Daniele Orlandi
• 16:17   Sample databases? mlw
• 16:38   Three types of functions, ala function redux. mlw
• 17:08   Re: Sample databases? Thomas Lockhart
• 17:19   Re: Three types of functions, ala function redux. Stephan Szabo
• 17:26   Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Oleg Bartunov
• 17:36   Re: Sample databases? Jeff Hoffmann
• 17:44   Re: libpq enhancement for multi-process application Sébastien Bonnet
• 17:53   Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Christopher Masto
• 18:08   Help me for "DBI->connect failed: Sorry, too many clients already." Joseph
• 18:11   Re: performance modality in 7.1 for large text attributes? Christopher Masto
• 18:37   Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Oleg Bartunov
• 19:39   Re: Manual changes for ALTER TABLE OWNER Mark Hollomon
• 20:45   Re: Re: Table name scope (was Re: [BUGS] Outer joins aren't working with views) Peter Eisentraut
• 22:03   RE: heap page corruption not easy Mikheev, Vadim
• 22:23   RE: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Mikheev, Vadim
• 23:33   RE: OID Implicit limit Christopher Kings-Lynne

20 December 2000

• 00:48   Re: [GENERAL] Re: Trigger Bruce Momjian
• 00:55   Re: OID Implicit limit Bruce Momjian
• 01:03   Re: Re: [DOCS] 7.1 features list Bruce Momjian
• 01:08   Re: performance modality in 7.1 for large text attributes? Bruce Momjian
• 01:19   Re: Manual changes for ALTER TABLE OWNER Bruce Momjian
• 02:08   PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status... Ryan Kirkpatrick
• 02:28   CHECK constraint names Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:45   7.1 snapshot on i386 BSD MAJOR failure bpalmer
• 05:56   PL/Python (was: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Trigger) Karel Zak
• 06:14   Bug in CREATE OPERATOR Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 06:38   sequence numbering on mails Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:05   Another OPERATOR bug?? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 09:08   Re: PL/Python (was: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Trigger) Hannu Krosing
• 09:46   Status of JDBC Interface Peter Mount
• 13:43   Re: Ocasional problems !!!! Luis Sousa
• 14:04   SSL Connections Oliver Elphick
• 14:12   Re: SSL Connections Dominic J. Eidson
• 14:24   Re: performance modality in 7.1 for large text attributes? Paul A Vixie
• 14:26   RE: SSL Connections Magnus Hagander
• 14:41   Re: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status... Tom Lane
• 14:58   Re: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status... Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
• 15:25   Re: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status... Bruce Momjian
• 15:37   Re: CHECK constraint names Stephan Szabo
• 15:42   RE: Bug in CREATE OPERATOR Darren King
• 15:42   Re: 7.1 snapshot on i386 BSD MAJOR failure Tom Lane
• 15:50   Re: OID Implicit limit Steve Howe
• 15:56   Re: [ADMIN] Help me for "DBI->connect failed: Sorry, too many clients already." Jie Liang
• 15:56   Replication toolkit added to repository Thomas Lockhart
• 16:02   Re: Bug in CREATE OPERATOR Tom Lane
• 16:05   day 2 results Paul A Vixie
• 16:29   Compiling on Win32 Luis Magaña
• 16:31   Re: Another OPERATOR bug?? Tom Lane
• 16:38   Re: Sample databases? Josh Rovero
• 16:41   Re: performance modality in 7.1 for large text attributes? Paul A Vixie
• 16:50   Re: day 2 results Tom Lane
• 16:58   Re: day 2 results Thomas Lockhart
• 16:59   MySQL conversion utility Thomas Lockhart
• 17:02   CIDR output format Tom Lane
• 17:08   Re: performance modality in 7.1 for large text attributes? Tom Lane
• 17:18   Re: performance modality in 7.1 for large text attributes? Larry Rosenman
• 17:21   Re: Isn't init_irels() dangerous ? Tom Lane
• 17:28   Re: Is PQreset() proper ? Tom Lane
• 17:43   Re: Sample databases? Tom Lane
• 17:46   Re: MySQL conversion utility Mike Sears
• 17:50   Re: Three types of functions, ala function redux. Tom Lane
• 18:00   Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Tom Lane
• 18:12   Re: Re: Table name scope (was Re: [BUGS] Outer joins aren't working with views) Tom Lane
• 18:25   problems with query Martin A. Marques
• 18:26   Re: problems with query Thomas Swan
• 18:44   Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Oleg Bartunov
• 18:51   Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Tom Lane
• 19:05   Future beta releases ... The Hermit Hacker
• 20:11   Re: Future beta releases ... Tom Lane
• 20:20   Re: Future beta releases ... The Hermit Hacker
• 20:36   Re: Future beta releases ... Oleg Bartunov
• 20:49   Re: Future beta releases ... The Hermit Hacker
• 20:56   Re: Sample databases? ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 21:40   Re: Replication toolkit added to repository Dan
• 21:55   Re: Replication toolkit added to repository The Hermit Hacker
• 22:26   Re: Isn't init_irels() dangerous ? Hiroshi Inoue

21 December 2000

• 01:42   Re: Is PQreset() proper ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:42   Re: [GENERAL] Compiling on Win32 Chris Ian Capon Fiel
• 02:12   Another vacuum problem Denis Perchine
• 02:18   Re: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status... (fwd) Ryan Kirkpatrick
• 02:27   Re: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status... Ryan Kirkpatrick
• 03:16   Re: Future beta releases ... Oleg Bartunov
• 03:37   Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Thomas Lockhart
• 03:48   Re: Sample databases? Thomas Lockhart
• 04:05   Re: Replication toolkit added to repository Thomas Lockhart
• 04:07   Re: MySQL conversion utility Thomas Lockhart
• 04:15   Re: Future beta releases ... Thomas Lockhart
• 04:17   Re: Is PQreset() proper ? Tom Lane
• 07:10   Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Hannu Krosing
• 07:15   Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Hannu Krosing
• 07:44   AW: Three types of functions, ala function redux. Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:53   AW: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:22   AW: day 2 results Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:46   Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Oleg Bartunov
• 09:59   Re: CIDR output format Larry Rosenman
• 10:25   Re: AW: Three types of functions, ala function redux. mlw
• 12:31   Re: AW: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status... Thomas Lockhart
• 13:19   AW: AW: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 13:25   Re: AW: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status... Tom Lane
• 13:37   Re: AW: AW: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status... Tom Lane
• 13:49   Re: SSL Connections Matthew Kirkwood
• 13:49   Re: CIDR output format Tom Lane
• 14:12   Re: AW: Three types of functions, ala function redux. Michael Fork
• 14:19   Re: CIDR output format Larry Rosenman
• 14:22   equal operator for _int4 (array of int4) Oleg Bartunov
• 14:34   Re: equal operator for _int4 (array of int4) Tom Lane
• 14:49   Re: Re: equal operator for _int4 (array of int4) Oleg Bartunov
• 15:10   Re: CIDR output format Alex Pilosov
• 15:23   Re: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status... Peter Eisentraut
• 15:33   Inline Comments for pg_dump Rod Taylor
• 15:57   Re: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status... Tom Lane
• 16:05   Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Hannu Krosing
• 16:08   Re: SSL Connections Oliver Elphick
• 16:12   Re: Re: equal operator for _int4 (array of int4) Tom Lane
• 16:24   Re: Status of JDBC Interface Peter Eisentraut
• 16:38   Re: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status... Peter Eisentraut
• 16:42   Re: Three types of functions, ala function redux. mlw
• 17:03   externalizing PGresult? Alfred Perlstein
• 17:08   Re: SSL Connections Bruce Momjian
• 17:19   Re: Inline Comments for pg_dump Bruce Momjian
• 19:34   (7.1) BIT datatype Oliver Elphick
• 20:05   Re: (7.1) BIT datatype Peter Eisentraut
• 20:30   Re: (7.1) BIT datatype Oliver Elphick
• 23:11   Re: TOAST-table vacuuming (was Re: Idea for reducing pl anning time) Tom Lane
• 23:24   RE: Inline Comments for pg_dump Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 23:28   RE: (7.1) BIT datatype Christopher Kings-Lynne

22 December 2000

• 05:28   Re: (7.1) BIT datatype Oliver Elphick
• 06:10   Re: Re: [PATCHES] A Patch for MIC to EUC_TW code converting inmbsupport Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:11   RE: Status of JDBC Interface Peter Mount
• 11:43   Merry X-Mass Partyka Robert
• 11:54   Re: Merry X-Mass Rod Taylor
• 13:17   Re: Merry X-Mass Partyka Robert
• 15:20   RI problem with inherited table Oliver Elphick
• 15:52   Re: RI problem with inherited table Tom Lane
• 17:01   Inheritance is a security loophole! Tom Lane
• 17:51   7.0.3: order by func in union Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:01   Re: Inheritance is a security loophole! Bruce Momjian
• 18:29   7.1current: order by func in union Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:53   Re: 7.1current: order by func in union Tom Lane
• 20:39   GEQO status? Ed Loehr
• 20:51   Re: GEQO status? Thomas Lockhart
• 21:03   Re: GEQO status? Ed Loehr
• 21:09   Re: GEQO status? Tom Lane
• 21:30   Unable to check out REL7_1 via cvs Yusuf Goolamabbas
• 21:32   Re: GEQO status? Ed Loehr
• 21:43   Re: Unable to check out REL7_1 via cvs Alfred Perlstein
• 21:46   Re: GEQO status? Ed Loehr
• 21:47   Re: Unable to check out REL7_1 via cvs Yusuf Goolamabbas
• 21:55   Re: Unable to check out REL7_1 via cvs Tom Lane
• 21:58   Re: Unable to check out REL7_1 via cvs Alfred Perlstein
• 22:05   Re: GEQO status? Tom Lane
• 22:07   Re: Unable to check out REL7_1 via cvs Peter Eisentraut
• 22:24   Re: GEQO status? Peter Eisentraut
• 22:38   Re: Isn't init_irels() dangerous ? Tom Lane
• 22:51   Re: GEQO status? Tom Lane
• 22:57   Re: GEQO status? Ed Loehr
• 23:00   Re: GEQO status? Tom Lane
• 23:27   7.1 on DEC/Alpha Brent Verner

23 December 2000

• 00:42   Considerations for running current cvs pgsql and pgsql release on same machine? Robert B. Easter
• 00:59   Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha Brent Verner
• 01:03   Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha Brent Verner
• 01:05   Re: Considerations for running current cvs pgsql and pgsql release on same machine? Tom Lane
• 05:39   Re: Considerations for running current cvs pgsql and pgsql release on same machine? Robert B. Easter
• 12:56   GNU readline and BSD license Bruce Momjian
• 13:40   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Peter Eisentraut
• 13:45   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Bruce Momjian
• 13:52   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Alex Pilosov
• 13:56   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Bruce Momjian
• 14:06   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Alex Pilosov
• 14:13   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Fabrice Scemama
• 14:18   Re: GNU readline and BSD license mlw
• 14:43   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Alfred Perlstein
• 14:48   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Bruce Momjian
• 15:12   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
• 15:15   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Bruce Momjian
• 20:12   Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier) Tom Lane
• 20:36   Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier) mlw
• 21:00   Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier) Peter Eisentraut
• 21:13   Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier) Tom Lane
• 21:37   Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier) Peter Eisentraut
• 21:42   Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier) Tom Lane
• 22:05   Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier) Bruce Momjian
• 22:24   Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier) Alfred Perlstein

24 December 2000

• 00:43   Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier) Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:59   Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier) Tom Lane
• 02:50   Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha Brent Verner
• 04:01   Re: Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha Tom Lane
• 04:13   Re: Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha Brent Verner
• 04:20   Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha Tom Lane
• 11:24   Re: RI problem with inherited table (fwd) Oliver Elphick

25 December 2000

• 00:00   Thoughts regarding pg_dump Rod Taylor
• 00:01   Upper limit on number of buffers? mlw
• 00:09   Re: Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha Brent Verner
• 01:03   Re: Upper limit on number of buffers? Alfred Perlstein
• 02:20   Re: Upper limit on number of buffers? Joe Conway
• 02:48   Re: Upper limit on number of buffers? Oleg Bartunov
• 21:05   COUNT(Distinct city) HELP!!! Abe
• 21:21   Re: COUNT(Distinct city) HELP!!! mlw
• 21:24   Re: Upper limit on number of buffers? mlw
• 23:27   Re: [GENERAL] COUNT(Distinct city) HELP!!! Stephan Szabo

26 December 2000

• 00:00   Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha Brent Verner
• 00:34   Re: COUNT(Distinct city) HELP!!! Abe
• 00:36   Re: COUNT(Distinct city) HELP!!! mlw
• 14:26   Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Tom Lane
• 15:23   Permissions on Stored Procedures jmoschet@netscape.net
• 15:44   Re: Re: GNU readline and BSD license Thomas Lockhart
• 16:09   Re: Re: GNU readline and BSD license mlw
• 21:03   Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Brent Verner

27 December 2000

• 02:41   Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Tom Lane
• 03:33   Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Brent Verner
• 03:56   PHP and PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 06:57   AW: GEQO status? Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:05   Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Brent Verner
• 07:39   AW: Inheritance is a security loophole! Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:03   configure in snapshout == configure.in Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:29   Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Brent Verner
• 10:01   About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SET CLIENT_ENCODING" Chih-Chang Hsieh
• 10:24   Re: About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SETCLIENT_ENCODING" Kevin Lo
• 11:43   Re: PHP and PostgreSQL mlw
• 11:49   Re: GEQO status? Andrew Snow
• 11:59   RE: PHP and PostgreSQL Matthew
• 12:12   Re: (7.1) BIT datatype Adriaan Joubert
• 12:38   Re: PHP and PostgreSQL Daniele Orlandi
• 13:09   Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Tom Lane
• 13:11   Re: PHP and PostgreSQL Rod Taylor
• 13:15   Re: PHP and PostgreSQL mlw
• 13:19   Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Tom Lane
• 13:29   Re: configure in snapshout == configure.in Tom Lane
• 14:17   Re: About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SETCLIENT_ENCODING" Thomas Lockhart
• 15:03   Re: [INTERFACES] PHP and PostgreSQL Frank Joerdens
• 15:40   Re: Permissions on Stored Procedures ==> current_user jmoschet@netscape.net
• 16:37   Re: configure in snapshout == configure.in Peter Eisentraut
• 16:47   Re: configure in snapshout == configure.in Tom Lane
• 19:26   Re: [INTERFACES] PHP and PostgreSQL Frank Joerdens
• 21:36   Re: About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SET CLIENT_ENCODING" Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:53   Re: PHP and PostgreSQL Adam Haberlach

28 December 2000

• 00:37   Re: Alpha tas() patch Tom Lane
• 00:44   Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Tom Lane
• 03:05   Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Brent Verner
• 06:06   Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Oliver Elphick
• 06:10   Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Tom Lane
• 06:24   Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Oliver Elphick
• 07:15   AW: configure in snapshout == configure.in Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 11:42   New WAL version (CRC & data pages backup) Vadim Mikheev
• 12:35   Re: Alpha tas() patch Brent Verner
• 13:04   Re: Re: Alpha tas() patch Adriaan Joubert
• 13:48   Re: Alpha tas() patch Tom Lane
• 14:06   Re: Re: Alpha tas() patch Brent Verner
• 14:16   Re: Re: Alpha tas() patch Tom Lane
• 14:54   Re: Alpha tas() patch Brent Verner
• 15:41   Re: Alpha tas() patch Tom Lane
• 15:50   Re: configure in snapshout == configure.in Peter Eisentraut
• 18:54   Connecting across internet Patrick Dunford
• 18:54   Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten Tom Lane
• 19:12   Re: Alpha tas() patch Brent Verner
• 19:33   Re: Alpha tas() patch Tom Lane
• 19:48   Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 19:56   RE: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:06   Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten Tom Lane
• 20:19   RE: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:19   Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten Tom Lane
• 21:18   Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 21:26   Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten Dominic J. Eidson
• 22:11   Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)

29 December 2000

• 00:45   Re: Alpha tas() patch Brent Verner
• 02:08   Re: Alpha tas() patch Tom Lane
• 02:45   Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten Tom Lane
• 02:58   Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten Alfred Perlstein
• 02:58   Re: Alpha tas() patch Brent Verner
• 03:32   Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten Tom Lane
• 12:16   Re: vacuum crash on 6.5.3 Tatsuo Ishii
• 15:30   Re: Upper limit on number of buffers? Michael J Schout
• 16:53   RE: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:02   Re: About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SET CLIENT_ENCODING" Bruce Momjian
• 17:58   Notify with Rules bugs? sergiop@sinectis.com.ar
• 18:12   Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 18:20   RE: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:27   pg_dump problem Matthew
• 20:10   Re: Notify with Rules bugs? Tom Lane
• 20:11   Re: GNU readline and BSD license The Hermit Hacker
• 20:13   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Alfred Perlstein
• 20:18   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Dominic J. Eidson
• 20:19   Re: GNU readline and BSD license The Hermit Hacker
• 20:20   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Lamar Owen
• 20:47   NULLS and <> : Discrepancies ? Emmanuel Charpentier,,,
• 21:07   as i work BLOB's from PostODBC Wilderman Ceren
• 21:15   Java and Postgresql Mike S. Avelar
• 21:22   how do i store \0 inside a text attribute? Paul A Vixie
• 21:25   Regress-test failure in current sources Tom Lane
• 21:31   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Patrick Welche
• 21:49   Re: NULLS and <> : Discrepancies ? Thomas Lockhart
• 22:06   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Peter Eisentraut
• 22:07   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
• 22:14   Re: how do i store \0 inside a text attribute? Tom Lane
• 22:23   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Alfred Perlstein
• 22:34   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
• 22:34   Re: GNU readline and BSD license The Hermit Hacker
• 22:41   Re: GNU readline and BSD license The Hermit Hacker
• 22:44   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Alfred Perlstein
• 22:51   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
• 22:52   Re: NULLS and <> : Discrepancies ? Tom Lane
• 23:01   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Alfred Perlstein
• 23:12   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
• 23:13   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Alfred Perlstein
• 23:22   Re: GNU readline and BSD license The Hermit Hacker
• 23:34   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Adam Haberlach
• 23:34   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
• 23:41   Re: GNU readline and BSD license The Hermit Hacker
• 23:42   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Peter Eisentraut
• 23:44   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
• 23:52   Re: GNU readline and BSD license The Hermit Hacker
• 23:55   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
• 23:57   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane

30 December 2000

• 00:02   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Adam Haberlach
• 00:04   Re: how do i store \0 inside a text attribute? Paul A Vixie
• 00:07   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Michael Alan Dorman
• 00:09   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Thomas Lockhart
• 00:17   Re: Upper limit on number of buffers? Joe Conway
• 00:37   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Alex Pilosov
• 00:38   Creating locales. Tim Uckun
• 00:50   Re: [INTERFACES] PHP and PostgreSQL Adam Lang
• 00:57   Possible SELECT bug in 7.0.2 Jean-Louis Leroy
• 01:02   Re: [INTERFACES] PHP and PostgreSQL Adam Lang
• 01:15   RE: GEQO status? Andrew Snow
• 01:19   Re: [INTERFACES] PHP and PostgreSQL Adam Lang
• 01:40   Re: About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SET CLIENT_ENCODING" Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:33   Re: Possible SELECT bug in 7.0.2 Tom Lane
• 05:41   Re: Beta1 starting date? Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:34   Re: Creating locales. Oleg Bartunov
• 09:46   Re: Creating locales. Hannu Krosing
• 12:00   oid failures on Alpha solved Brent Verner
• 13:14   Re: GNU readline and BSD license mlw
• 13:36   Just fixed Vadim Mikheev
• 15:57   Re: oid failures on Alpha solved Tom Lane
• 17:24   Re: oid failures on Alpha solved Tom Lane
• 18:04   Re: oid failures on Alpha solved Brent Verner
• 18:04   Re: GNU readline and BSD license teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 18:09   Re: [DOCS] Inheritance docs error. Tom Lane
• 21:45   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Peter Bierman

31 December 2000

• 00:25   Re: oid failures on Alpha solved Brent Verner
• 01:17   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Alex Pilosov
• 01:58   heap_modifytuple() - help needed Horst Herb
• 02:12   RE: vacuum crash on 6.5.3 Hiroshi Inoue
• 10:00   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Peter Eisentraut
• 10:09   Re: [DOCS] Inheritance docs error. Peter Eisentraut
• 12:48   PRIMARY KEY and INHERITANCE Ferruccio Zamuner
• 17:13   Re: PRIMARY KEY and INHERITANCE Oliver Elphick
• 21:03   Re: PRIMARY KEY and INHERITANCE Horst Herb
• 21:59   pg_dumpall (7.1beta1, current CVS) Larry Rosenman
• 23:36   Re: pg_dumpall (7.1beta1, current CVS) Larry Rosenman