Bruce Guenter <bruceg@em.ca> writes:
>> A good theory, but unfortunately not a correct theory. PA-RISC can do a
>> circular shift in one cycle using the "shift right double" instruction,
> Interesting. I was under the impression that virtually no RISC CPU had
> a rotate instruction. Do any others?
Darn if I know. A RISC purist would probably say that PA-RISC isn't all
that reduced ... for example, the reason it needs six cycles not seven
for the CRC inner loop is that the LOAD instruction has an option to
postincrement the pointer register (like a C "*ptr++").
> Same with the x86 core:
> movb %dl,%al
> xorb (%ecx),%al
> andl $255,%eax
> shrl $8,%edx
> incl %ecx
> xorl (%esi,%eax,4),%edx
> On my Celeron, the timing for those six opcodes is almost whopping 13
> cycles per byte. Obviously there's some major performance hit to do the
> memory instructions, because there's no more than 4 cycles worth of
> dependant instructions in that snippet.
Yes. It looks like we're looking at pipeline stalls for the memory
reads. I expect PA-RISC would have the same problem if it were not that
the CRC table and data buffer are almost certainly loaded into level-2
cache memory. Curious that you don't get the same result --- what is
the memory cache architecture on your box?
As Nathan remarks nearby, this is just minutiae, but I'm interested
anyway...
regards, tom lane
