Thanks for responding. I will definitely kepp your comments in mind.
Cheers,
Randy
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Nathan Myers wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 05:09:31PM -0500, Randy Jonasz wrote:
> >
> > I know it's been a while since we last discussed a possible rewrite of
> > the C++ API but I now have some time to devote to it.
> >
> > The following are my ideas for implementing the C++ API:
> >
> > I need suggestions, additions, comments etc!
>
> It would be helpful if the interface elements were to satisfy the STL
> requirements on iterators and collections. Those specify a minimum
> interface, which may be extended as needed.
>
> The one caveat is, don't try to "shoehorn" any semantics into the
> interface; anything that doesn't fit precisely should be treated
> as an extension instead, and the corresponding standard interface
> left unimplemented.
>
> Nathan Myers
> ncm@zembu.com
>
>
>
Randy Jonasz
Software Engineer
Click2net Inc.
Web: http://www.click2net.com
Phone: (905) 271-3550
"You cannot possibly pay a philosopher what he's worth,
but try your best" -- Aristotle
