* Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> [001205 08:37] wrote:
> BTW, I just remembered that in 7.0.*, the SLocks that are managed by
> SpinAcquire() all live in their own little shm segment. On a machine
> where slock_t is char, it'd likely only amount to 128 bytes or so.
> Maybe you are seeing some bug in FreeBSD's handling of tiny shm
> segments?
Good call, i think I found it! :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
