Re: OID Implicit limit - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: OID Implicit limit
Date
Msg-id 200012200249.VAA15154@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: OID Implicit limit  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
We have an FAQ item on this now under OID's.

[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > >         Reading the documentation, I see that OIDs are unique through
> the
> > > whole database.
> > >         But since OIDs are int4, does that limit the number of rows I
> can
> > > have in a database to 2^32 = 4 billion ?
> >
> > Yep.
> >
> > Thanks for the answer - although that concerns me a bit.
> > Maybe I could recompile it setting oid to int64 type...
> 
> If that really concerns you, then the rest of the hackers list I think would
> be very interested in hearing of a real-world database with more than 4
> billion rows/inserts/deletes.
> 
> Apparently it is somewhat more complicated than just 'recompiling as an
> int64' to change this.  I believe that patches are currently being made to
> facilitate a future move towards 64bit OIDs, but I am not certain of the
> status.
> 
> Chris
> 
> 


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Trigger
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [DOCS] 7.1 features list