Re: day 2 results - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: day 2 results
Date
Msg-id 5931.977336937@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to day 2 results  (Paul A Vixie <vixie@mfnx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Paul A Vixie <vixie@mfnx.net> writes:
> the occasional 1.2sec has got to be due to some kind of scheduling or I/O
> irregularity.

Hmm, could it just be delay when your syncer process runs?  Under WAL,
I believe we don't fsync anything except the WAL log file, so a bulk
insert operation would probably create lots and lots of dirty kernel
buffers that syncer would decide to shove out to disk every 30 sec or
so.  Is there any way to correlate the timing spikes against syncer
activity?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Paul A Vixie
Date:
Subject: Re: performance modality in 7.1 for large text attributes?
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: day 2 results