Re: Why vacuum? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alfred Perlstein
Subject Re: Why vacuum?
Date
Msg-id 20001214093855.B4589@fw.wintelcom.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why vacuum?  (mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
* mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com> [001214 09:30] wrote:
> "Martin A. Marques" wrote:
> > 
> > El Mié 13 Dic 2000 16:41, bpalmer escribió:
> > > I noticed the other day that one of my pg databases was slow,  so I ran
> > > vacuum on it,  which brought a question to mind:  why the need?  I looked
> > > at my oracle server and we aren't doing anything of the sort (that I can
> > > find),  so why does pg need it?  Any info?
> > 
> > I know nothing about Oracle, but I can tell you that Informix has an update
> > statistics, which I don't know if it's similar to vacuum, but....
> > What vacuum does is clean the database from rows that were left during
> > updates and deletes, non the less, the tables get shrincked, so searches get
> > faster.
> > 
> 
> While I would like Postgres to perform statistics, one and a while, on
> it own. I like vacuum in general.
> 
> I would rather trade unused disk space for performace. The last thing
> you need during high loads is the database thinking that it is time to
> clean up.

Even worse is having to scan a file that has grown 20x the size
because you havne't vacuum'd in a while.

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: mlw
Date:
Subject: Re: Why vacuum?
Next
From: Daniele Orlandi
Date:
Subject: Re: Why vacuum?