Re: Why vacuum? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From mlw
Subject Re: Why vacuum?
Date
Msg-id 3A38C6FD.3F519E6@mohawksoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Why vacuum?  (bpalmer <bpalmer@crimelabs.net>)
Responses Re: Why vacuum?  (Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Martin A. Marques" wrote:
> 
> El Mié 13 Dic 2000 16:41, bpalmer escribió:
> > I noticed the other day that one of my pg databases was slow,  so I ran
> > vacuum on it,  which brought a question to mind:  why the need?  I looked
> > at my oracle server and we aren't doing anything of the sort (that I can
> > find),  so why does pg need it?  Any info?
> 
> I know nothing about Oracle, but I can tell you that Informix has an update
> statistics, which I don't know if it's similar to vacuum, but....
> What vacuum does is clean the database from rows that were left during
> updates and deletes, non the less, the tables get shrincked, so searches get
> faster.
> 

While I would like Postgres to perform statistics, one and a while, on
it own. I like vacuum in general.

I would rather trade unused disk space for performace. The last thing
you need during high loads is the database thinking that it is time to
clean up.

-- 
http://www.mohawksoft.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alfred Perlstein
Date:
Subject: Re: Why vacuum?
Next
From: Alfred Perlstein
Date:
Subject: Re: Why vacuum?