Re: - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Oleg Bartunov
Subject Re:
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.3.96.SK.1001209190014.4174z-100000@ra
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re:  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 10:45:33 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>
> Cc: vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 
> 
> Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes:
> > btw, is there a restriction to length of key in GiST in 7.1 ?
> 
> Index tuples still have to fit in a block --- no TOAST table for
> an index (yet).

not a good news. indexing and quering sets requires much more length.
is there plan to do this ?

> 
> I think we can compress index datums in-line though; at least that
> should work in principle.

we could use loosy compression of GiST indices.
regards,
    Oleg

> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 

_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c)
Next
From: "Edmar Wiggers"
Date:
Subject: RE: OK, does anyone have any better ideas?