RE: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Edmar Wiggers
Subject RE: OK, does anyone have any better ideas?
Date
Msg-id NEBBIAKDCDHFGJMLHCKICEBHCCAA.edmar@brasmap.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas?  (mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>)
Responses RE: OK, does anyone have any better ideas?  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Personally, I'm not too afraid of having an FTS engine outside the database.
Oracle's Intermedia, which has a very powerful/fast FTS engine, uses that
approach.

I could look into how they do the SQL integration, maybe it would yeld some
ideas.

Mark, about that row identifier: OID's are no good for fast find. Maybe you
could use tuple id (TID). But please note that tuple ID's change after a
simple update. It's like the offset of the row inside the table file (and
therefore blazing fast to get to that row again).

One possible idea for SQL integration: can one use index access-method
functions to query the FTS outside the database? Yes, it would require some
work, but the results I guess it would be wonderful. Ok, Tom, not so fast as
an index sitting inside Postgres, but AFAICS that's not going to happen
anytime soon.

Yours sincerely,

Edmar Wiggers
BRASMAP Information Systems
+55 48 9960 2752




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re:
Next
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: RE: OK, does anyone have any better ideas?