Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

RE: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mikheev, Vadim
Subject RE: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten
Date
Msg-id 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D3224@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
> > Actually, one slocks are held
> > longer than anothers - probably we should use different delays...
> 
> I don't understand the last remark.  Are you proposing to mix some 
> random numbers into the delays?

No, use different s_spincycle-s for different slocks.

Vadim

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
Date:
Subject: Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten
Next
From: Matthew
Date:
Subject: pg_dump problem