Re: Re: CRC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
Subject Re: Re: CRC
Date
Msg-id 20001208130027.A22256@store.zembu.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CRC  (ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers))
Responses Re: Re: CRC  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 11:10:19AM -0800, I wrote:
> Current evidence suggests that MD4 would be a good choice for a hash
> algorithm.

Thinking about it, I suspect that any CRC implementation that can't outrun 
MD5 by a wide margin is seriously sub-optimal.  Can you post any more
details about how the tests were run?  I'd like to try it.

Nathan Myers
ncm@zembu.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pre-beta is slow
Next
From: Bruce Guenter
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: CRC