Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) writes:
> > Explictly, yes. However, FHS says /tmp is for temporary files. Also,
> > it says programs shouldn't count on data to be stored there between
> > invocations. 10+ days isn't temporary...
> >>
> >> We aren't counting on data to be stored in /tmp "between invocations".
>
> > Between invocations of client programs. You're using /tmp as a shared
> > of stored data.
>
> Huh? The socket and lockfile are created and held open by the
> postmaster for the duration of its run. Client programs don't even know
> that the lockfile is there, in fact. How can you argue that client
> program lifespan has anything to do with it?
Nothing but the postmaster uses it? If so, there shouldn't be a
problem moving it.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
