Re: Ungraceful handling of fatal flex errors - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From dom@idealx.com
Subject Re: Ungraceful handling of fatal flex errors
Date
Msg-id 20010129202536.D9891@seccotine.ird.idealx.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Ungraceful handling of fatal flex errors  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> This is flex, not yacc, and our lexer has been flex-only for a long
> time.  It's possible that the hack would break in a future version
> of flex, but I doubt it.  What else is a lexer going to use fprintf
> for?
 Hmm, well of course you are right... (and I could use some sleep too
:-). OK, this becomes a non-issue then.

-- 
<< Tout n'y est pas parfait, mais on y honore certainement les jardiniers >>
        Dominique Quatravaux <dom@kilimandjaro.dyndns.org>


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: Size of TODO.detail
Next
From: KuroiNeko
Date:
Subject: Re: Security hole in PL/pgSQL