Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0101201936090.1033-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken?
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Tom Lane writes:
> >> Er, what will you ifdef exactly,
>
> > + #ifdef __cplusplus

#ifndef, I meant.  I.e., only declare it when in C, since libpq++ does not
use it.  libpq doesn't use it either, but it uses tons of strerror().

> >   #ifdef HAVE_SYS_NERR
> >   extern int sys_nerr;
> >   #endif
> > + #endif
>
> >> and what are the odds that it will fail on some other platform?
>
> > I don't see how it would fail.  At least it won't add more possible
> > failure cases.
>
> If that can't fail, why do we need to provide a declaration of sys_nerr
> at all?
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
>

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken?