Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken?
Date
Msg-id 3583.980014491@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> Er, what will you ifdef exactly,

> + #ifdef __cplusplus
>   #ifdef HAVE_SYS_NERR
>   extern int sys_nerr;
>   #endif
> + #endif

>> and what are the odds that it will fail on some other platform?

> I don't see how it would fail.  At least it won't add more possible
> failure cases.

If that can't fail, why do we need to provide a declaration of sys_nerr
at all?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: "initdb -t" destroys all databases
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken?