Re: Bit strings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Bit strings
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0101192353160.1322-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bit strings  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Bit strings  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > perhaps
> > #define IsA_Value(t) \
> >          (IsA(t, Integer) || IsA(t, Float) || IsA(t, String))
> > should be augmented with BitString.  Can someone advise?
>
> Yes, definitely --- see the sole use of that macro, in outfuncs.c.

Maybe this macro could be removed and expanded in place.  That would make
things more transparent.  Or is there any other potential use?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Bit strings
Next
From: "Mikheev, Vadim"
Date:
Subject: RE: A couple of fishy-looking critical sections