Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator proble ms o n AI X - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator proble ms o n AI X
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0101191723160.1322-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator proble ms o n AI X  (Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
Zeugswetter Andreas SB writes:

> We do not need any execution time checks for this at all. The objective is
> to determine whether mktime works for any results that would be negative.
> On AIX and IRIX all calls to mktime for dates before 1970 lead to a result of
> -1, and the configure test is supposed to give a define for exactly that behavior.

Okay, so you call mktime with a pre-1970 date once when the system starts
up or when the particular function is first used and then save the result
in a static variable.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX
Next
From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Date:
Subject: AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AI X