Re: CASE inet << inet ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: CASE inet << inet ...
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.31.0101162121590.21849-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CASE inet << inet ...  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
ah shit, trying to come up with an example, I figured out what I did ...
some of the records don't fall into that range, so of course, to_ip isn't,
so it just displays teh fron_ip *sigh*

I'm going back to sleep now ... :(


On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > Just trying to summarize some traffic stats, and am either running the
> > query wrong, or you can't do this?
>
> I can't tell if there's anything wrong with that or not.  You didn't
> show us the input data being used by the CASE expression ...
>
>             regards, tom lane
>

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: DeadLockCheck is buggy
Next
From: Keith Gray
Date:
Subject: Boolean and Bit