Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now
Date
Msg-id 3A557DEB.36D789AB@tpf.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> I just finished running the parallel regress tests with inval.c rigged
> to flush the relcache and syscache at every available opportunity,
> that is anytime we could recognize a shared-cache-inval message from
> another backend (see diff below).  This setup gives a whole new universe
> of meaning to the word "slow" --- it took *three full days* to run the
> standard "make check" procedure, including eighteen hours just to do the
> "vacuum template1" part of initdb.  I kid you not.  But it worked.
> Looks like the unexpected-cache-entry-drop class of problems are indeed
> gone.
> 

Great.
Thanks.

Hiroshi Inoue


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: time + date_part oddness?
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing ColLabel tokens