Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

5 January 2001

• 00:56   Cobol TO SQL To PostgreSQL Luis Fernando Fabara M.
• 02:19   bit_length() Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:21   Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now Tom Lane
• 04:48   Re: time + date_part oddness? Thomas Lockhart
• 05:29   Re: Missing ColLabel tokens Thomas Lockhart
• 05:29   Re: Re: time + date_part oddness? Tom Lane
• 05:37   Re: Re: time + date_part oddness? Thomas Lockhart
• 05:39   Re: Re: time + date_part oddness? Tom Lane
• 05:54   Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now Hiroshi Inoue
• 08:52   Re: Missing ColLabel tokens Hannu Krosing
• 09:04   Re: Please review TODO list Hannu Krosing
• 11:25   Re: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump return status.. Philip Warner
• 14:22   Re: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump return status.. Tom Lane
• 17:30   Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now Alex Pilosov
• 17:38   Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now Tom Lane
• 17:44   Recursion and SPI Ian Lance Taylor
• 18:44   RE: Recursion and SPI Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:13   Re: Recursion and SPI Ian Lance Taylor
• 20:17   Re: pg_dump return status.. ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:26   Re: pg_dump return status.. Ian Lance Taylor
• 20:27   bootstrap tables Ross J. Reedstrom
• 20:34   Beta2 ... ? The Hermit Hacker
• 20:49   RE: Beta2 ... ? Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:56   Re: Beta2 ... ? Tom Lane
• 21:03   Re: Recursion and SPI Tom Lane
• 21:11   Re: Beta2 ... ? mike
• 21:13   Re: pg_dump return status.. Tom Lane
• 21:25   Re: bootstrap tables Tom Lane
• 21:35   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Lamar Owen
• 21:48   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Tom Lane
• 22:02   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Lamar Owen
• 22:17   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Tom Lane
• 22:32   Re: Isn't init_irels() dangerous ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:47   Re: Isn't init_irels() dangerous ? Tom Lane
• 22:47   Re: bootstrap tables Ross J. Reedstrom
• 22:57   Re: Isn't init_irels() dangerous ? Hiroshi Inoue