Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dominic J. Eidson
Subject Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0101290031500.23652-100000@morannon.the-infinite.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone  ("Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Oliver Elphick wrote:

> It seems to me that the main reason for the problem is the need to
> cater for non-root installs.  I would really like to know what

PostgreSQL will _not_ run as root. Just try... :)

morannon:~>/usr/local/pgsql/bin/postmaster

"root" execution of the PostgreSQL backend is not permitted.

The backend must be started under its own userid to prevent
a possible system security compromise. See the INSTALL file for
more information on how to properly start the postmaster.

morannon:~>

> proportion of total PostgreSQL installs they now are.  We are

100%

> Are there still people who can only install PostgreSQL as a private 
> application?

Private application - or non-root application?


-- 
Dominic J. Eidson                                       "Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!" - Gimli
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.the-infinite.org/              http://www.the-infinite.org/~dominic/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone
Next
From: "Oliver Elphick"
Date:
Subject: Can PyGreSQL be updated?