Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup
Date
Msg-id 9518.979929422@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup
Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I believe the formatting problem was that some code had
> "command;command; : lkjasfd : asldfk" while some had them spread over
> separate lines, and others used \n\, all very randomly.  Now at least
> they are all consistent and use similar formatting.

And they may all be broken, except for the one(s) you have tested.
You shouldn't be assuming that a platform that uses gcc necessarily
also uses gas.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup