Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Frank Joerdens
Subject Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ]
Date
Msg-id 20010125214716.B15595@rakete.joerdens.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ]  (Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>)
Responses Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report  (ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers))
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 12:04:40PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
[ . . . ]
> > for the /tmp directory, which looks distinctly odd to me. What kind of
> > device is swap (I know what swap is normally but I didn't know you could
> > mount stuff there . . . )??
> 
> That is a tmpfs file system which uses swap space for /tmp storage.
> Both swap usage and /tmp compete for the same partition on the disk.
> If you have a lot of swapping programs, you don't get to put much in
> /tmp.  If you have a lot of files in /tmp, you don't get to run many
> programs.
> 
> As far as I can recall, this is a Sun specific thing.
> 
> It's a reasonable idea on a stable system.  It's a pretty crummy idea
> on a development system, or one with unpredictable loads.  My
> experience is that either something goes crazy and fills up /tmp and
> then you can't run anything else and you have to reboot, or something
> goes crazy and fills up swap and then you can't write any /tmp files
> and daemon processes start to silently die and you have to reboot.

Very peculiar, or crummy, indeed. This is system is not used by anyone
else besides myself at the moment (cuz it's just being built up), as far
a I can tell, and is ludicrously overpowered (3 CPUs, 768 MB RAM) for
the mundane uses I am subjecting it to (installing and testing
Postgresql).

Regards, Frank 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Randy Hall
Date:
Subject: Re: RPM: Contrib request.
Next
From: Kovacs Zoltan
Date:
Subject: "backend closed" --- I'd like to write a conversion function