Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.31.0101111833420.21628-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
Responses Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Oleg Bartunov wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes:
> > > I understand Tom's arguments and respect his experience, so I think it's
> > > possible to put link to my page in 7.1 docs for people interested in
> > > GiST features.
> >
> > Bear in mind that I only have one core vote ;-).  We've already had some
> > private core discussion about whether to accept this patch now, and so
> > far I think I'm outvoted.
> >
>
> There are several Tom Lane, judge by your activity. You probably need
> several votes.
>
> > Did I understand you to say that you'd added some regression tests for
> > GiST?  That would lessen my unhappiness a little bit ...
>
> Yes, we did. Currently all files are available from my page
> http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/gist/
> I could submit them to hackers list if CORE people got consensus

Okay, if there are appropriate regression tests, I'm going to say go for
it ...

Does anyone have any objections to my downloading the tar file (doing that
now), committing the changes and wrapping up a quick Beta4 just so that we
have a tar ball that is testable right away?

Save Lamar and the other packagers a bit of work by avoiding beta3
packages :)





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!