Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now
Date
Msg-id 1667.979063255@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Can this now be marked as done?
> * Modification  of  pg_class  can  happen while table in use by  another
> backend.  Might  lead  to  MVCC  inside  of  syscache

I'm not sure.  Do you have any record of what the concern was, in
detail?  I don't understand what the TODO item is trying to say.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Quite strange crash
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now