Home > mailing lists

Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 May 2006

05:02 RELKIND_SPECIAL Alvaro Herrera
05:15 XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table Mark Wong
10:26 InsertXLogFile in pg_resetxlog Martijn van Oosterhout
12:55 Re: inet increment with int Patrick Welche
13:41 WITH/WITH RECURSIVE implementation discussion Mark Cave-Ayland
13:55 Re: WITH/WITH RECURSIVE implementation discussion Jonah H. Harris
14:29 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Tom Lane
14:40 Re: RELKIND_SPECIAL Tom Lane
14:49 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? mark@mark.mielke.cc
15:18 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Tom Lane
15:20 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? mark@mark.mielke.cc
15:25 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Tom Lane
15:34 Re: InsertXLogFile in pg_resetxlog Tom Lane
15:45 Re: InsertXLogFile in pg_resetxlog Jonah H. Harris
16:02 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Bruno Wolff III
16:12 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Tom Lane
17:29 Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Larry Rosenman
18:04 Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Jim C. Nasby
18:05 CVSup server seems to be down Alvaro Herrera
18:07 Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Jim C. Nasby
18:13 Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Jim C. Nasby
18:15 Re: CVSup server seems to be down Marc G. Fournier
18:16 Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Larry Rosenman
18:19 Re: Automatic free space map filling Jim C. Nasby
18:35 Re: Automatic free space map filling Tom Lane
18:37 Re: Automatic free space map filling Martijn van Oosterhout
19:05 Re: InsertXLogFile in pg_resetxlog Jonah H. Harris
19:08 Re: InsertXLogFile in pg_resetxlog Tom Lane
19:18 Re: InsertXLogFile in pg_resetxlog Jonah H. Harris
20:24 Re: Automatic free space map filling Dawid Kuroczko
21:05 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Jim C. Nasby
21:15 Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Larry Rosenman
21:37 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Jim C. Nasby
21:41 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Jim C. Nasby
22:03 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Lukas Smith
23:47 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Tom Lane
23:56 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Tom Lane

2 May 2006

01:37 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Christopher Kings-Lynne
01:46 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? elein
02:26 Re: InsertXLogFile in pg_resetxlog Jonah H. Harris
02:26 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Greg Stark
03:03 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Tom Lane
05:27 Re: Constraint Exclusion + Joins? Brandon Black
05:47 Re: Constraint Exclusion + Joins? Tom Lane
08:35 Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Nikolay Samokhvalov
08:51 Re: WITH/WITH RECURSIVE implementation discussion Mark Cave-Ayland
09:53 Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table Simon Riggs
10:11 Re: Constraint Exclusion + Joins? Simon Riggs
10:34 Re: Automatic free space map filling Simon Riggs
10:36 Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Jonah H. Harris
11:07 Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Simon Riggs
12:53 Re: Constraint Exclusion + Joins? Brandon Black
12:55 Re: Constraint Exclusion + Joins? Hannu Krosing
13:23 Re: WITH/WITH RECURSIVE implementation discussion Jonah H. Harris
13:42 Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Larry Rosenman
15:01 Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
15:50 Re: Automatic free space map filling Jim C. Nasby
17:01 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Jim C. Nasby
17:07 Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table Jim C. Nasby
18:18 patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats. Larry Rosenman
18:43 Re: patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats. Larry Rosenman
19:01 Typo in ginxlog.c Alvaro Herrera
19:19 Re: patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats. Martijn van Oosterhout
20:56 Rome university letizia leo
21:48 Re: Rome university Alvaro Herrera
22:02 Re: Rome university Martijn van Oosterhout
22:49 Re: patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats. Jim C. Nasby

3 May 2006

00:39 sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1 Jim C. Nasby
02:49 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? elein
03:07 Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1 Tom Lane
07:54 Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
07:58 [SoC] Relation between project "XML improvements" and "pgxml" Robert Staudinger
09:12 bug? non working casts for domain Fabien COELHO
11:38 Re: Automatic free space map filling Hannu Krosing
13:10 drop database command blocking other connections Jim Buttafuoco
13:55 Re: patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats. Martijn van Oosterhout
15:12 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Jim C. Nasby
15:22 Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1 Jim C. Nasby
17:06 inclusion of hstore software in main tarball hubert depesz lubaczewski
17:37 Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1 Tom Lane
17:40 Re: inclusion of hstore software in main tarball Lukas Smith
17:48 Re: patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats. Jim C. Nasby
17:49 Re: inclusion of hstore software in main tarball Jim C. Nasby
18:04 Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1 Jim C. Nasby
18:14 Re: Automatic free space map filling Tom Lane
18:17 Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1 Larry Rosenman
18:23 Re: drop database command blocking other connections Tom Lane
18:26 Re: patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats. Tom Lane
18:29 Re: drop database command blocking other connections Jim Buttafuoco
19:12 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? elein
20:15 Rethinking locking for database create/drop vs connection startup Tom Lane
20:24 Re: [SoC] Relation between project "XML improvements" and "pgxml" Jonah H. Harris
21:09 Re: drop database command blocking other connections Tony Wasson
21:18 Re: drop database command blocking other connections Jim Buttafuoco
21:46 Re: [SoC] Relation between project "XML improvements" and "pgxml" Nikolay Samokhvalov
21:58 Warts with SELECT DISTINCT Greg Stark
22:02 Re: [SoC] Relation between project "XML improvements" and "pgxml" Nikolay Samokhvalov

4 May 2006

04:42 Re: Warts with SELECT DISTINCT Bruno Wolff III
04:46 Re: Warts with SELECT DISTINCT Greg Stark
04:51 Re: Warts with SELECT DISTINCT Bruno Wolff III
05:13 Re: Warts with SELECT DISTINCT Tom Lane
05:19 Re: Rethinking locking for database create/drop vs connection Christopher Kings-Lynne
05:33 Re: Warts with SELECT DISTINCT Greg Stark
06:04 Re: Warts with SELECT DISTINCT Bruno Wolff III
06:21 Re: Warts with SELECT DISTINCT Bruno Wolff III
06:39 Re: Warts with SELECT DISTINCT Tom Lane
06:49 Revised R* tree using GiST fernando esparza
07:05 Re: Revised R* tree using GiST Oleg Bartunov
07:22 Re: Revised R* tree using GiST Teodor Sigaev
07:44 Re: Rethinking locking for database create/drop vs Simon Riggs
07:47 Re: Typo in ginxlog.c Simon Riggs
07:59 Semi-undocumented functions in libpq Martijn van Oosterhout
13:29 autovacuum logging, part deux. Larry Rosenman
14:05 Re: Warts with SELECT DISTINCT Bruno Wolff III
14:11 Re: Rethinking locking for database create/drop vs connection startup Tom Lane
14:13 pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions Markus Schiltknecht
15:04 Re: autovacuum logging, part deux. Chris Browne
15:42 Re: autovacuum logging, part deux. Rod Taylor
16:25 Re: autovacuum logging, part deux. Larry Rosenman
16:40 Re: autovacuum logging, part deux. Rod Taylor
16:47 Re: Warts with SELECT DISTINCT Greg Stark
16:48 Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq Tom Lane
17:03 Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions Tom Lane
17:05 Re: patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats. Jim C. Nasby
17:18 Re: Typo in ginxlog.c Jim C. Nasby
17:18 Re: Warts with SELECT DISTINCT Tom Lane
17:20 Re: patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats. Tom Lane
17:23 Re: autovacuum logging, part deux. Jim C. Nasby
17:38 Re: patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats. Jim C. Nasby
18:34 Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq Martijn van Oosterhout
19:02 Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions Thomas Hallgren
19:22 Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq Tom Lane
19:27 Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions Tom Lane
19:37 Re: patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats. Tom Lane
20:38 Re: [GENERAL] Adding ON UPDATE CASCADE to an existing foreign key Jim C. Nasby
21:01 [bruno@wolff.to: Re: [GENERAL] 8.1.4 anytime soon?] Jim C. Nasby
21:33 Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq Martijn van Oosterhout
21:39 Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions David Fetter
22:07 Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq Tom Lane

5 May 2006

02:05 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Bruce Momjian
02:48 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Tom Lane
03:28 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Gurjeet Singh
04:19 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Jonah H. Harris
06:30 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Thomas Hallgren
07:42 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Magnus Hagander
07:49 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Christopher Kings-Lynne
07:50 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Magnus Hagander
08:16 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Christopher Kings-Lynne
09:27 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Hiroshi Saito
09:36 Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Bruce Momjian
09:38 Re: Altering view ownership doesn't work ... Bruce Momjian
16:12 Transactions per second Jim Nasby
16:22 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC William ZHANG
17:01 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & Chuck McDevitt
17:33 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Martijn van Oosterhout
17:46 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Magnus Hagander
17:55 8.1.3 and unused files Rod Taylor
18:02 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Magnus Hagander
18:09 Re: 8.1.3 and unused files Tom Lane
18:28 Re: 8.1.3 and unused files Rod Taylor
18:32 Re: 8.1.3 and unused files Tom Lane
18:54 Re: 8.1.3 and unused files Rod Taylor
19:10 Re: 8.1.3 and unused files Tom Lane
20:01 Re: 8.1.3 and unused files Rod Taylor
20:11 Re: 8.1.3 and unused files Tom Lane
21:12 Re: 8.1.3 and unused files Darcy Buskermolen
21:14 Re: Transactions per second Hannu Krosing
22:11 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & Dave Page
22:25 Re: 8.1.3 and unused files Rod Taylor
22:51 Re: Transactions per second Jim C. Nasby
22:53 Re: 8.1.3 and unused files Tom Lane
23:00 Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table Mark Wong
23:21 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & Chuck McDevitt
23:23 Re: 8.1.3 and unused files Rod Taylor

6 May 2006

08:21 Re: Transactions per second Hannu Krosing
09:04 Re: InsertXLogFile in pg_resetxlog Martijn van Oosterhout
11:10 Remove behaviour of postmaster -o Andy Chambers
12:37 Re: Remove behaviour of postmaster -o Bruce Momjian
15:16 Re: Remove behaviour of postmaster -o Tom Lane
15:26 Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions Thomas Hallgren
15:52 Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions Martijn van Oosterhout
15:55 Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions Tom Lane
16:15 Re: InsertXLogFile in pg_resetxlog Jonah H. Harris
16:31 Re: InsertXLogFile in pg_resetxlog Bruce Momjian
21:26 Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Add support for GnuTLS Bruce Momjian
21:49 Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions Thomas Hallgren
22:16 Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions Thomas Hallgren
23:10 Re: bug? non working casts for domain Bruce Momjian

7 May 2006

01:53 Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions Tom Lane
02:19 Re: bug? non working casts for domain Tom Lane
02:50 Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions James William Pye
03:37 Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions Tom Lane
10:15 Fwd: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Gurjeet Singh
12:03 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Gurjeet Singh
16:03 Demoting the "width" part of EXPLAIN Greg Sabino Mullane
16:54 Compiling PL/Perl and Pl/Python on x86_64 imacat
17:00 Re: Demoting the "width" part of EXPLAIN Jim C. Nasby
17:06 Re: Demoting the "width" part of EXPLAIN Tom Lane
17:10 Re: Compiling PL/Perl and Pl/Python on x86_64 Tom Lane
19:59 Re: Compiling PL/Perl and Pl/Python on x86_64 imacat
21:10 Re: Fwd: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Thomas Hallgren

8 May 2006

16:34 Number of dimensions of an array parameter Thomas Hallgren
16:48 Re: Number of dimensions of an array parameter Tom Lane
17:31 Re: Number of dimensions of an array parameter Thomas Hallgren
17:34 Pragma linking? Magnus Hagander
17:43 Re: Number of dimensions of an array parameter Stefan Kaltenbrunner
17:56 Re: Pragma linking? Tom Lane
17:59 Re: Pragma linking? Magnus Hagander
18:06 Re: Number of dimensions of an array parameter Rod Taylor
18:06 Re: Number of dimensions of an array parameter Martijn van Oosterhout
18:09 Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table Simon Riggs
18:11 Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table Mark Wong
18:18 Re: bug? non working casts for domain elein
18:20 Re: Number of dimensions of an array parameter Tom Lane
18:25 Re: Pragma linking? Tom Lane
18:27 Re: Pragma linking? Magnus Hagander
19:52 Re: Number of dimensions of an array parameter Thomas Hallgren
20:06 Re: Number of dimensions of an array parameter Thomas Hallgren
21:28 Re: Remove behaviour of postmaster -o Peter Eisentraut
22:50 BTree on-disk page ordering Jim C. Nasby
23:14 Re: BTree on-disk page ordering Tom Lane

9 May 2006

01:14 Inheritance, Primary Keys and Foreign Keys Albert Cervera Areny
03:20 Re: Remove behaviour of postmaster -o Tom Lane
08:37 Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal PFC
09:32 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal PFC
09:32 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Christian Kratzer
09:42 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Christian Kratzer
10:09 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal PFC
10:36 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Martijn van Oosterhout
11:28 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal PFC
11:46 Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Max Khon
12:04 Need a help - Performance issues Dhanaraj M
13:32 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Tom Lane
15:00 Re: Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Greg Stark
16:28 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal PFC
16:31 Re: Number of dimensions of an array parameter Bruce Momjian
16:34 Re: Compiling PL/Perl and Pl/Python on x86_64 imacat
16:37 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal PFC
16:43 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Dawid Kuroczko
16:48 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal PFC
19:05 Re: Number of dimensions of an array parameter Tom Lane
19:13 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Tom Lane
19:43 Re: Inheritance, Primary Keys and Foreign Keys Simon Riggs
20:40 standard_conforming_strings vs escape_string_warning Tom Lane
21:31 Re: Need a help - Performance issues Andrej Ricnik-Bay
23:13 Re: Number of dimensions of an array parameter Bruce Momjian

10 May 2006

00:04 EXPLAIN verbose? Cristiano Duarte
04:00 Re: Constraint Exclusion + Joins? kris.shannon@gmail.com
05:44 BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Dennis Bjorklund
06:19 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Tom Lane
06:24 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Christopher Kings-Lynne
06:25 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Lukas Smith
06:25 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Jaime Casanova
07:33 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Albe Laurenz
08:02 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Mario Weilguni
08:10 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Martijn van Oosterhout
08:14 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Mario Weilguni
09:00 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Peter Eisentraut
09:44 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Bernd Helmle
10:32 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Mario Weilguni
10:36 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Mario Weilguni
12:01 Re: [GENERAL] intarray internals Teodor Sigaev
12:06 Need some clarification Dhanaraj M
13:02 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Bernd Helmle
13:29 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Markus Schaber
14:37 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal PFC
14:56 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Martijn van Oosterhout
15:04 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Markus Schaber
15:43 Re: bug? non working casts for domain Fabien COELHO
15:53 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Nis Jorgensen
15:59 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Markus Schaber
16:09 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Dennis Bjorklund
16:11 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Gurjeet Singh
16:55 Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table Mark Wong
16:56 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Mike Benoit
18:40 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Jim C. Nasby
18:48 [TODO] Allow commenting of variables ... Zdenek Kotala
19:00 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Jim C. Nasby
19:06 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Jim C. Nasby
19:22 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal PFC
19:24 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Jim C. Nasby
19:26 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal PFC
19:34 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal PFC
20:14 Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1 Jim C. Nasby
20:17 Re: [TODO] Allow commenting of variables ... Alvaro Herrera
20:24 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Mark Dilger
20:24 Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1 Alvaro Herrera
20:39 Re: Need a help - Performance issues Jim C. Nasby
21:04 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Jim C. Nasby
21:05 Re: [TODO] Allow commenting of variables ... Bruce Momjian
21:26 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Martijn van Oosterhout
21:52 Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1 Jim C. Nasby
22:09 Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1 Martijn van Oosterhout
22:23 Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1 Jim C. Nasby
23:26 .pgpass file and unix domain sockets Joachim Wieland

11 May 2006

00:32 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Tom Lane
01:24 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Tom Lane
01:34 Re: .pgpass file and unix domain sockets Tom Lane
01:46 [TODO] Allow commenting of variables ... Zdenek Kotala
02:25 Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Tom Lane
02:43 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Jaime Casanova
04:15 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clean up code associated with updating pg_class statistics Alvaro Herrera
04:41 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Dennis Bjorklund
05:11 Warning -- PostgreSQL Anniversary Cutoff Approaching Josh Berkus
06:12 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Tommi Maekitalo
07:28 Re: .pgpass file and unix domain sockets Martijn van Oosterhout
07:55 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Marko Kreen
07:55 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
08:27 Re: intarray internals Volkan YAZICI
08:31 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Martijn van Oosterhout
12:02 Re: Bug in signal handler [Was: [TODO] Allow commenting Zdenek Kotala
12:17 Re: Bug in signal handler [Was: [TODO] Allow commenting Martijn van Oosterhout
12:24 Re: Bug in signal handler Douglas McNaught
13:09 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clean up code associated with updating pg_class statistics Tom Lane
13:36 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clean up code associated with updating Bruce Momjian
14:03 Re: Bug in signal handler Martijn van Oosterhout
14:11 Re: Bug in signal handler Tom Lane
15:00 Upcoming releases Tom Lane
15:36 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Greg Stark
16:42 Re: Bug in signal handler Martijn van Oosterhout
17:10 Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1 Jim C. Nasby
17:18 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Jim C. Nasby
17:39 Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1 Martijn van Oosterhout
18:03 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Scott Marlowe
18:03 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Martijn van Oosterhout
18:44 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Martijn van Oosterhout
18:46 hashagg, statistisics and excessive memory allocation Stefan Kaltenbrunner
19:05 Re: hashagg, statistisics and excessive memory allocation Josh Berkus
19:28 Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table Simon Riggs
19:39 Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1 Jim C. Nasby
19:50 Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1 Martijn van Oosterhout
19:53 Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table Mark Wong
19:57 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Jim C. Nasby
19:58 Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1 Alvaro Herrera
20:00 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Jim C. Nasby
20:07 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Jim C. Nasby
20:09 Compressing table images Brian Hurt
20:17 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Simon Riggs
20:47 Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1 Jim C. Nasby
20:47 Re: Compressing table images Joshua D. Drake
21:01 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Jim C. Nasby
21:05 Re: Compressing table images Alvaro Herrera
21:19 Re: hashagg, statistisics and excessive memory allocation Jim C. Nasby
21:32 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal PFC
21:56 Re: Compressing table images Jim C. Nasby
22:08 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Tom Lane
22:58 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Jim C. Nasby

12 May 2006

03:58 Continuing "pgstat update timeout" failures in buildfarm Tom Lane
06:53 Re: EXPLAIN verbose? Qingqing Zhou
07:20 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Mario Weilguni
09:49 any, anyelement, and anyarray Thomas Hallgren
11:31 Clarification required Dhanaraj M
12:29 Re: Clarification required Dave Page
13:00 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Jaime Casanova
13:47 Re: any, anyelement, and anyarray Tom Lane
14:29 Re: any, anyelement, and anyarray Thomas Hallgren
14:51 Re: Continuing "pgstat update timeout" failures in buildfarm Bruce Momjian
15:06 Re: any, anyelement, and anyarray Tom Lane
16:21 Re: Clarification required Jim C. Nasby
17:11 audit table containing Select statements submitted Hogan, James F. Jr.
17:19 DH_check return value test correct? Michael Fuhr
17:31 Re: Bug in signal handler Florian Weimer
17:32 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Josh Berkus
17:52 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Joshua D. Drake
18:05 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Andrew Dunstan
18:21 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Josh Berkus
18:44 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Andrew Dunstan
19:06 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Jim C. Nasby
22:36 Re: Inheritance, Primary Keys and Foreign Keys Albert Cervera Areny
22:40 Re: DH_check return value test correct? Tom Lane
22:52 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Tom Lane
23:00 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Tom Lane
23:24 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Josh Berkus
23:37 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Joshua D. Drake
23:51 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Joshua D. Drake

13 May 2006

00:38 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Bruce Momjian
01:02 Re: DH_check return value test correct? Michael Fuhr
01:03 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Tom Lane
01:06 Re: DH_check return value test correct? Tom Lane
02:15 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options
04:47 Re: Need some clarification Qingqing Zhou
04:57 Re: Need some clarification Tom Lane
06:33 Re: Inheritance, Primary Keys and Foreign Keys Thomas Hallgren
08:55 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Martijn van Oosterhout
09:10 Re: DH_check return value test correct? Martijn van Oosterhout
15:39 Re: Inheritance, Primary Keys and Foreign Keys Albert Cervera Areny
19:38 pg_dump and backslash escapes Bruce Momjian
20:03 Re: pg_dump and backslash escapes Tom Lane

14 May 2006

00:42 Re: Upcoming releases Tom Lane
02:27 Re: pg_dump and backslash escapes Bruce Momjian
07:14 Creating a SHELL type [Was: User Defined Types in Java] Thomas Hallgren
10:16 Re: Creating a SHELL type [Was: User Defined Types in Java] Martijn van Oosterhout
10:53 Re: Inheritance, Primary Keys and Foreign Keys Albert Cervera Areny
11:16 Re: Inheritance, Primary Keys and Foreign Keys Thomas Hallgren
16:58 Re: Inheritance, Primary Keys and Foreign Keys Hannu Krosing
19:17 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Marc Munro
21:00 Re: Fwd: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Gurjeet Singh

15 May 2006

03:38 Re: Fwd: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Josh Berkus
03:51 Re: Fwd: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Gurjeet Singh
05:25 Re: Fwd: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio Thomas Hallgren
14:39 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Hogan, James F. Jr.
15:03 Creating a Pseudocolumn Jonah H. Harris
15:08 Re: Creating a Pseudocolumn Martijn van Oosterhout
15:17 Re: Creating a Pseudocolumn Jonah H. Harris
15:36 Re: Creating a Pseudocolumn Martijn van Oosterhout
15:40 Re: [PORTS] Compiling on 8.1.3 on Openserver 5.05 Bruce Momjian
15:42 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Jim C. Nasby
15:43 Re: Creating a Pseudocolumn Tom Lane
15:51 Re: Creating a Pseudocolumn Jonah H. Harris
15:55 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Hogan, James F. Jr.
16:02 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Jim C. Nasby
16:37 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Douglas McNaught
17:45 Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
17:54 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2429: Explain does not report object's schema Jim C. Nasby
18:11 Re: [TODO] Allow commenting of variables ... Joachim Wieland
18:18 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Tom Lane
19:17 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Jim C. Nasby
19:29 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
19:45 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Andrew Dunstan
20:02 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
20:10 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Martijn van Oosterhout
20:14 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
20:37 Re: Iterating generator from C (PostgreSQL's pl/python RETUN Hannu Krosing
21:21 Re: Iterating generator from C (PostgreSQL's pl/python RETUN Tom Lane
22:16 Re: [PATCHES] Iterating generator from C (PostgreSQL's Hannu Krosing
22:28 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Ron Mayer

16 May 2006

00:12 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Tom Lane
00:43 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Joshua D. Drake
02:17 Why use " != " ipig
02:49 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Christopher Kings-Lynne
02:58 psql feature thought Joshua D. Drake
03:18 Re: psql feature thought Tom Lane
03:26 Re: psql feature thought Qingqing Zhou
03:28 Re: Why use " != " Qingqing Zhou
03:36 Re: Why use " != " Gurjeet Singh
03:43 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting mark@mark.mielke.cc
03:45 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2429: Explain does not report object's schema Gurjeet Singh
03:50 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2429: Explain does not report object's schema Tom Lane
03:52 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Gregory Maxwell
03:55 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Bruce Momjian
04:03 Re: Why use " != " ipig
04:20 Re: Creating a Pseudocolumn Tom Lane
04:42 Re: psql feature thought Joshua D. Drake
05:00 Re: psql feature thought Michael Glaesemann
05:17 Re: psql feature thought Tom Lane
05:30 Re: psql feature thought Joshua D. Drake
05:31 Re: psql feature thought Thomas Hallgren
07:10 Re: psql feature thought Michael Glaesemann
07:24 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
08:17 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
08:47 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2429: Explain does not report object's schema Martijn van Oosterhout
09:48 Re: Creating a Pseudocolumn Gurjeet Singh
09:52 Wrong plan for simple join with index on FK Pavel Stehule
10:00 Re: Creating a Pseudocolumn Martijn van Oosterhout
10:10 Re: Wrong plan for simple join with index on FK Martijn van Oosterhout
10:55 Re: Wrong plan for simple join with index on FK Pavel Stehule
11:06 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2429: Explain does not report object's schema Gurjeet Singh
11:14 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2429: Explain does not report object's schema Martijn van Oosterhout
11:28 Re: Wrong plan for simple join with index on FK Martijn van Oosterhout
12:00 Re: Wrong plan for simple join with index on FK Pavel Stehule
12:36 Re: Wrong plan for simple join with index on FK Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
13:13 Re: Wrong plan for simple join with index on FK Pavel Stehule
13:26 Re: psql feature thought Tom Lane
13:32 Re: Creating a Pseudocolumn Tom Lane
13:34 Help!!!! winlinchu
13:39 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Bort, Paul
13:44 Re: Creating a Pseudocolumn Jonah H. Harris
13:49 Re: Help!!!! Jonah H. Harris
15:02 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2429: Explain does not report object's schema Cristiano Duarte
15:53 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Andrew Dunstan
15:59 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Rod Taylor
16:27 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Andrew Dunstan
16:33 Re: [PATCHES] .pgpass file and unix domain sockets Andrew Dunstan
16:38 Re: [PATCHES] .pgpass file and unix domain sockets Bruce Momjian
16:50 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Josh Berkus
17:23 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
17:31 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
17:47 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2429: Explain does not report object's schema Jim C. Nasby
18:50 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2429: Explain does not report object's schema Gurjeet Singh
19:50 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2429: Explain does not report object's schema Alvaro Herrera
20:39 Re: psql feature thought Mark Dilger
20:43 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
21:47 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Martijn van Oosterhout
21:50 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
21:58 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Martijn van Oosterhout
22:48 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Tom Lane
22:48 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Greg Stark
23:21 PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax David Wheeler
23:30 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Andrew Dunstan
23:37 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Mark Dilger
23:40 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax David Wheeler
23:42 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Mark Dilger
23:48 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax David Wheeler
23:58 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax David Wheeler

17 May 2006

00:03 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Mark Dilger
00:07 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax David Wheeler
00:21 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Andrew Piskorski
00:51 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Jaime Casanova
02:07 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax David Wheeler
02:40 Re: pg_dump and backslash escapes Bruce Momjian
02:52 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Tom Lane
02:52 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Gurjeet Singh
02:56 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax David Wheeler
03:47 Re: pg_dump and backslash escapes Tom Lane
03:48 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Tom Lane
03:48 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Greg Stark
03:52 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Tom Lane
03:58 Re: pg_dump and backslash escapes Bruce Momjian
03:59 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax David Wheeler
04:03 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Tom Lane
04:59 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Jaime Casanova
05:13 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Tom Lane
05:21 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Thomas Hallgren
06:31 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Greg Stark
07:11 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Albe Laurenz
07:17 Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted Gurjeet Singh
07:46 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Albe Laurenz
08:06 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Martijn van Oosterhout
08:46 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Martijn van Oosterhout
08:52 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Andrew Piskorski
10:20 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
11:14 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Hannu Krosing
11:17 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Andrew Dunstan
11:47 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
12:26 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jonah H. Harris
12:44 Return results for PQexec vs PQexecP* Greg Sabino Mullane
12:53 Re: Return results for PQexec vs PQexecP* Martijn van Oosterhout
13:35 Re: pg_dump and backslash escapes Bruce Momjian
13:44 What default is - SET behavior Zdenek Kotala
13:49 Re: What default is - SET behavior Bruce Momjian
14:11 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Tom Lane
14:19 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2429: Explain does not report object's schema Cristiano Duarte
14:19 Foreign key column reference ordering and information_schema Stephan Szabo
14:25 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Tom Lane
14:27 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Andrew Dunstan
14:28 Re: Return results for PQexec vs PQexecP* Tom Lane
14:31 Re: pg_dump and backslash escapes Tom Lane
14:38 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax William ZHANG
14:39 Re: pg_dump and backslash escapes Bruce Momjian
14:40 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Tom Lane
14:47 Re: pg_dump and backslash escapes Tom Lane
14:54 Re: What default is - SET behavior Tom Lane
14:56 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
15:01 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
15:04 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
15:07 Re: pg_dump and backslash escapes Bruce Momjian
15:08 Re: Return results for PQexec vs PQexecP* Jeroen T. Vermeulen
15:09 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Jim C. Nasby
15:10 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Jim C. Nasby
15:14 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Jim C. Nasby
15:20 Re: Foreign key column reference ordering and information_schema Tom Lane
15:27 Re: pg_dump and backslash escapes Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
15:29 Re: pg_dump and backslash escapes Bruce Momjian
15:33 Re: pg_dump and backslash escapes Tom Lane
15:38 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Tom Lane
15:43 Re: pg_dump and backslash escapes Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
15:45 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
15:54 Re: Foreign key column reference ordering and information_schema Stephan Szabo
15:57 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Tom Lane
16:00 Re: Foreign key column reference ordering and information_schema Stephan Szabo
16:05 Re: Foreign key column reference ordering and information_schema Tom Lane
16:08 Re: Foreign key column reference ordering and information_schema Tom Lane
16:13 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Bruce Momjian
16:17 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Rod Taylor
16:21 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Martijn van Oosterhout
16:37 Re: Foreign key column reference ordering and information_schema Stephan Szabo
16:46 Re: pg_dump and backslash escapes Bruce Momjian
16:56 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Greg Stark
16:59 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Tom Lane
17:01 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Greg Stark
17:06 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Larry Rosenman
17:08 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Bruce Momjian
17:10 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Larry Rosenman
17:13 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Tom Lane
17:15 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Bruce Momjian
17:16 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Bruce Momjian
17:16 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Tom Lane
17:18 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Tom Lane
17:19 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Larry Rosenman
17:19 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Josh Berkus
17:21 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Bruce Momjian
17:21 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Bruce Momjian
17:23 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Larry Rosenman
17:23 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Josh Berkus
17:25 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Tom Lane
17:29 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Tom Lane
17:35 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Larry Rosenman
18:31 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Bruce Momjian
18:32 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Bruce Momjian
18:39 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Andrew Dunstan
19:02 Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options Bruce Momjian
19:31 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Tom Lane
19:51 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
19:54 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
19:59 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Hannu Krosing
20:06 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Hannu Krosing
20:12 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Jim C. Nasby
20:20 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
20:31 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Andrew Dunstan
20:59 Cross-version dumps (was: [DOCS] Mention pg_dump version portability) Jim C. Nasby
21:22 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Hannu Krosing
21:40 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Andrew Dunstan
21:44 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Greg Stark
21:52 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Jonah H. Harris
21:52 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
22:29 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Hannu Krosing
22:42 Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Robert Watson
22:45 Re: Foreign key column reference ordering and information_schema Mark Dilger

18 May 2006

00:17 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Jonah H. Harris
00:29 [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Mark Woodward
00:48 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Bruce Momjian
01:36 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? John DeSoi
02:32 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error Bruce Momjian
02:34 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Tom Lane
04:08 Desperately Seeking Mentors -- Right Now! Josh Berkus
04:13 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Jaime Casanova
04:25 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Greg Stark
04:41 Re: pg_dump and backslash escapes Greg Stark
06:08 buildfarm failures Tom Lane
06:11 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Hannu Krosing
07:28 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Albe Laurenz
07:42 Re: Desperately Seeking Mentors -- Right Now! Michael Meskes
07:49 Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Gregory S. Williamson
07:53 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Florian Weimer
07:53 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Florian Weimer
07:59 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Florian Weimer
08:57 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
09:30 Re: Clarification required Dhanaraj M
09:32 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Hannu Krosing
09:35 Re: Clarification required Dave Page
09:47 Google and the Beta Freeze Simon Riggs
10:35 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Simon Riggs
11:26 Re: Google and the Beta Freeze Robert Treat
14:27 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Andrew Dunstan
14:40 Re: Google and the Beta Freeze Tom Lane
15:31 Re: Google and the Beta Freeze Josh Berkus
15:35 Re: Google and the Beta Freeze Jonah H. Harris
15:41 Question about casts Thomas Hallgren
15:53 Re: Question about casts Martijn van Oosterhout
16:02 Re: Google and the Beta Freeze Robert Treat
16:07 Re: Question about casts Thomas Hallgren
16:07 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Bruce Momjian
16:08 Re: pg_dump and backslash escapes Bruce Momjian
16:19 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
16:23 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
16:24 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Jim C. Nasby
16:39 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Josh Berkus
16:49 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? John DeSoi
17:11 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Joshua D. Drake
17:16 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Alvaro Herrera
17:25 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Marc G. Fournier
17:36 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Joshua D. Drake
17:40 Re: Question about casts Tom Lane
17:43 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Tom Lane
17:50 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Bruce Momjian
17:56 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Marc G. Fournier
18:02 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Josh Berkus
18:09 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? David Fetter
18:14 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? David Fetter
18:23 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Jim C. Nasby
18:30 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Jim C. Nasby
18:32 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Joshua D. Drake
18:33 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Martijn van Oosterhout
18:34 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Stephen Frost
18:40 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? David Fetter
18:41 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Andrew Dunstan
18:51 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Mark Woodward
19:00 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Mark Woodward
19:04 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Thomas Hallgren
19:17 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Joshua D. Drake
19:23 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Andrew Dunstan
19:43 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Jim C. Nasby
19:50 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Joshua D. Drake
19:58 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Lukas Smith
20:02 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Michael Paesold
20:17 Re: Question about casts Tom Lane
20:18 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
20:18 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? David Fetter
20:25 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Joshua D. Drake
20:26 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Joshua D. Drake
20:31 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Jim C. Nasby
20:32 Toward A Positive Marketing Approach. Michael Dean
20:36 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Tom Lane
20:42 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Lukas Kahwe Smith
20:51 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Toward A Positive Marketing Approach. elein
20:55 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Tom Lane
21:03 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Chris Browne
21:17 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Philippe Schmid
21:27 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Thomas Hallgren
21:47 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add simplified sparc8 ASM for solaris_sparc.s, from Alan Stange. Tom Lane
21:56 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add simplified sparc8 ASM for solaris_sparc.s, Bruce Momjian
23:26 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Dawid Kuroczko

19 May 2006

00:15 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Robert Treat
00:17 text_position worst case runtime Mark Dilger
00:23 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Mark Dilger
00:35 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Robert Treat
00:36 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Andreas Seltenreich
00:39 New feature proposal Marc Munro
00:40 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Douglas McNaught
00:45 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Mark Dilger
00:54 Re: text_position worst case runtime Tom Lane
01:31 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Christopher Kings-Lynne
01:38 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Christopher Kings-Lynne
01:38 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Christopher Kings-Lynne
01:42 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Mark Kirkwood
01:49 Re: text_position worst case runtime Mark Dilger
02:33 TupleDesc refcounting, again Tom Lane
03:03 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
04:05 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Thomas Hallgren
05:28 Re: Toward A Positive Marketing Approach. Greg Stark
06:26 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Thomas Hallgren
06:56 SSL certificate info on SQL level and HSM support for libpq Victor B. Wagner
07:30 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Martijn van Oosterhout
07:56 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Jeroen T. Vermeulen
08:02 Re: SSL certificate info on SQL level and HSM support for libpq Martijn van Oosterhout
08:37 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Tommi Maekitalo
11:57 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Luke Lonergan
13:03 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Tom Lane
13:19 ... Dragan Zubac
13:27 Re: Larry Rosenman
13:31 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Martijn van Oosterhout
13:43 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Tom Lane
14:20 Re: Tom Lane
14:33 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Jim C. Nasby
15:12 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Joshua D. Drake
15:18 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Mark Woodward
15:34 Re: [GENERAL] Weird ..... (a=1 or a=2) <> (a=2 or a=1) Tom Lane
15:38 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Martijn van Oosterhout
15:44 Re: New feature proposal Simon Riggs
16:03 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? Tom Lane
16:04 Re: [GENERAL] Weird ..... (a=1 or a=2) <> (a=2 or a=1) Rafael Martinez
16:07 Re: New feature proposal Andreas Pflug
16:07 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Andreas Pflug
16:08 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? Jeff Frost
16:12 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Joshua D. Drake
16:15 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Alvaro Herrera
16:17 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? Tom Lane
16:21 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? Tom Lane
16:21 Re: text_position worst case runtime Jim C. Nasby
16:23 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Andrew Dunstan
16:24 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Jim C. Nasby
16:25 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? Simon Riggs
16:26 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Rod Taylor
16:27 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? Simon Riggs
16:32 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Joshua D. Drake
16:32 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? Jeff Frost
16:37 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? Jeff Frost
16:41 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? Simon Riggs
16:46 Re: text_position worst case runtime Tom Lane
16:55 Re: text_position worst case runtime Alvaro Herrera
16:56 Re: New feature proposal Marc Munro
17:06 Re: New feature proposal Josh Berkus
17:08 Re: text_position worst case runtime Tom Lane
17:15 Re: [pgsql-hackers] Daily digest v1.5943 (21 messages) Marc Munro
17:18 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Toward A Positive Marketing Approach. Josh Berkus
18:04 Re: text_position worst case runtime Greg Stark
18:19 Re: text_position worst case runtime Tom Lane
18:22 OO PostgreSQL Driver Joshua D. Drake
18:23 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Toward A Positive Marketing Approach. Tom Lane
18:25 Re: New feature proposal Marc Munro
18:39 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
18:44 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Jim C. Nasby
18:44 Re: New feature proposal Tom Lane
18:49 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Joshua D. Drake
18:53 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Tom Lane
18:58 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Jim C. Nasby
19:01 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Hannu Krosing
19:07 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Hannu Krosing
19:14 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] OO PostgreSQL Driver Robert Treat
19:28 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Mark Woodward
19:31 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Martijn van Oosterhout
19:32 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
19:35 Re: New feature proposal Marc Munro
19:39 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Jim C. Nasby
19:49 String Similarity Mark Woodward
19:54 Re: String Similarity Martijn van Oosterhout
19:57 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
19:59 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] OO PostgreSQL Driver Joshua D. Drake
19:59 Re: String Similarity Andrew Dunstan
20:00 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Jim C. Nasby
20:04 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Chris Browne
20:07 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Hannu Krosing
20:11 Re: text_position worst case runtime Hannu Krosing
20:12 Re: text_position worst case runtime Mark Dilger
20:14 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] OO PostgreSQL Driver Alvaro Herrera
20:27 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Toward A Positive Marketing Approach. Matthew T. O'Connor
20:32 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Bruce Momjian
20:39 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Andrew Dunstan
20:42 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Bruce Momjian
20:53 Re: String Similarity Mark Dilger
20:53 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Martijn van Oosterhout
20:59 Re: String Similarity Mark Woodward
21:12 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Jim C. Nasby
21:28 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Hannu Krosing
21:42 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Hannu Krosing
21:47 Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax Tom Lane
22:01 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Jonah H. Harris
22:12 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Joshua D. Drake
22:15 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Tom Lane
22:19 Re: text_position worst case runtime Tom Lane
22:27 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Hannu Krosing
22:38 Re: text_position worst case runtime Hannu Krosing
22:43 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Hannu Krosing
22:49 Re: String Similarity Greg Sabino Mullane
22:53 Re: text_position worst case runtime Hannu Krosing
23:05 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Bruce Momjian
23:06 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Bruce Momjian
23:14 Re: String Similarity Josh Berkus
23:45 Re: text_position worst case runtime Alvaro Herrera
23:53 Jaime Casanova

20 May 2006

00:25 Re: patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats. Bruce Momjian
00:49 Re: String Similarity Mark Woodward
04:30 Re: String Similarity Oleg Bartunov
04:54 Re: text_position worst case runtime Greg Stark
06:24 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Martijn van Oosterhout
08:36 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Lukas Smith
08:42 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Martijn van Oosterhout
08:49 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Lukas Kahwe Smith
08:57 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Tino Wildenhain
11:17 Re: String Similarity Mark Woodward
12:29 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Dawid Kuroczko
13:00 Re: String Similarity Mark Woodward
14:30 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Mark Woodward
15:31 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Jim C. Nasby
15:34 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Jim C. Nasby
16:55 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Joshua D. Drake
17:47 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Mark Woodward
19:04 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Toward A Positive Marketing Approach. Josh Berkus

21 May 2006

11:45 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Martijn van Oosterhout
16:57 COMMIT leads to ROLLBACK Gurjeet Singh
17:07 Re: COMMIT leads to ROLLBACK Tom Lane
17:11 Re: COMMIT leads to ROLLBACK Jaime Casanova
17:59 Re: COMMIT leads to ROLLBACK Gurjeet Singh
18:06 Re: COMMIT leads to ROLLBACK Gurjeet Singh
18:31 Re: COMMIT leads to ROLLBACK Jaime Casanova
21:00 FW: iDefense Q2 2006 Vulnerability Challenge Magnus Hagander
21:16 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? Jeff Frost
21:28 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? Simon Riggs
21:35 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? Tom Lane
21:35 problem with PQsendQuery/PQgetResult and COPY FROM statement max.poletto@gmail.com
21:36 Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) Mischa Sandberg
21:39 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? Jeff Frost
21:50 Re: problem with PQsendQuery/PQgetResult and COPY FROM statement Volkan YAZICI
21:58 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) Josh Berkus
22:15 Re: problem with PQsendQuery/PQgetResult and COPY FROM statement Tom Lane
22:43 Re: FW: iDefense Q2 2006 Vulnerability Challenge Tom Lane

22 May 2006

03:11 Re: String Similarity Christopher Kings-Lynne
06:54 Re: problem with PQsendQuery/PQgetResult and COPY FROM statement Martijn van Oosterhout
06:56 Re: SSL certificate info on SQL level and HSM support for libpq Victor B. Wagner
07:05 Re: SSL certificate info on SQL level and HSM support for libpq Martijn van Oosterhout
08:24 Re: group by points Albe Laurenz
10:17 Duplicate definition of LOCALEDIR Peter Eisentraut
11:36 Re: String Similarity Mark Woodward
12:19 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Hannu Krosing
12:39 Re: Duplicate definition of LOCALEDIR Martijn van Oosterhout
14:41 Re: SSL certificate info on SQL level and HSM support for libpq Tom Lane
15:00 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) Jim C. Nasby
15:02 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) Jim C. Nasby
15:07 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) Martijn van Oosterhout
15:23 Re: Duplicate definition of LOCALEDIR Tom Lane
15:30 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) Dawid Kuroczko
15:35 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) Harald Fuchs
15:42 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) Jim C. Nasby
18:18 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Jim C. Nasby
18:25 error-free disabling of individual child partition tables April Lorenzen
18:40 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Mark Woodward
18:45 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) Martijn van Oosterhout
18:56 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Dawid Kuroczko
19:02 pgbench create index anomoly Jim C. Nasby
19:11 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS Bruce Momjian
19:14 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) Alvaro Herrera
19:15 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Martijn van Oosterhout
19:15 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) Jim C. Nasby
19:22 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition tables Jim C. Nasby
19:26 Update on sort-compression stuff Martijn van Oosterhout
19:28 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Andrew Dunstan
19:33 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS Jim C. Nasby
19:38 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) Jim C. Nasby
19:39 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Jim C. Nasby
19:42 Re: Update on sort-compression stuff Jim C. Nasby
19:42 Re: Update on sort-compression stuff Tom Lane
19:54 Re: pgbench create index anomoly Simon Riggs
20:01 Re: pgbench create index anomoly Jim C. Nasby
20:04 Re: Compiling PL/Perl and Pl/Python on x86_64 imacat
20:09 Re: group by points Bruno Wolff III
20:11 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Andrew Dunstan
20:18 Re: Compiling PL/Perl and Pl/Python on x86_64 Andrew Dunstan
20:19 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Simon Riggs
20:39 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS Bruce Momjian
20:42 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Andrew Dunstan
20:47 Re: Compiling PL/Perl and Pl/Python on x86_64 Theo Schlossnagle
21:37 Re: [GENERAL] autovacuum "connections" are hidden Alvaro Herrera
21:45 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL: trace and profile Mischa Sandberg
21:46 Re: [GENERAL] autovacuum "connections" are hidden Casey Duncan
21:53 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but Mischa Sandberg
22:00 Re: FW: iDefense Q2 2006 Vulnerability Challenge Robert Treat
22:34 Re: pgbench create index anomoly Tom Lane
22:38 Re: group by points Tom Lane
23:12 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) Tom Lane
23:42 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but Andrew Dunstan
23:48 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) Tom Lane
23:55 Re: group by points Bruno Wolff III

23 May 2006

03:59 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? Jeff Frost
04:02 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? Tom Lane
04:11 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? Jeff Frost
07:03 API changes in patch release Thomas Hallgren
07:24 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) Thomas Hallgren
07:49 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
09:51 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Simon Riggs
11:37 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Hannu Krosing
11:55 Performance Issues Dhanaraj M
12:13 Re: Performance Issues Douglas McNaught
13:38 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Tom Lane
14:13 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Hannu Krosing
14:19 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Tom Lane
14:24 Re: Performance Issues Richard Huxton
14:24 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Simon Riggs
14:36 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Csaba Nagy
14:42 Re: Performance Issues Dave Cramer
14:49 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client Simon Riggs
14:54 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? Tom Lane
14:59 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Simon Riggs
15:01 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client Simon Riggs
15:09 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? Tom Lane
15:17 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client Simon Riggs
15:21 Why is CVS server so slow? Simon Riggs
15:23 file-locking and postmaster.pid Andreas Joseph Krogh
15:24 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Hannu Krosing
15:26 Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client Tom Lane
15:27 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Simon Riggs
15:31 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Tom Lane
15:54 Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention Gavin Hamill
15:54 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Tom Lane
16:05 Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention Tom Lane
16:10 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Andreas Joseph Krogh
16:10 Re: New feature proposal Marc Munro
16:26 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Tom Lane
16:45 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Simon Riggs
16:52 Re: Performance Issues Mark Woodward
17:10 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Adis Nezirovic
17:17 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Tom Lane
17:37 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Tom Lane
17:49 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Simon Riggs
18:06 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Adis Nezirovic
18:09 Re: [GENERAL] autovacuum "connections" are hidden Jim C. Nasby
18:27 Re: Update on sort-compression stuff Tom Lane
18:52 Re: [GENERAL] Weird ..... (a=1 or a=2) <> (a=2 or a=1) Merlin Moncure
19:04 Re: Update on sort-compression stuff Simon Riggs
19:17 Re: API changes in patch release Bruce Momjian
19:18 Re: [GENERAL] Weird ..... (a=1 or a=2) <> (a=2 or a=1) Tom Lane
19:25 Re: API changes in patch release Magnus Hagander
19:37 Re: API changes in patch release Andrew Dunstan
20:58 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Bruce Momjian
20:58 SQL compliant interval implementation Brendan Jurd
21:04 Re: SQL compliant interval implementation Bruce Momjian
21:54 Re: SQL compliant interval implementation Tom Lane
22:17 Re: SQL compliant interval implementation Josh Berkus
22:37 Re: SQL compliant interval implementation Brendan Jurd
22:45 Re: SQL compliant interval implementation Bruce Momjian
23:12 LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes Rodrigo Hjort
23:19 Re: SQL compliant interval implementation Josh Berkus
23:30 Re: Why is CVS server so slow? Marc G. Fournier
23:32 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL -- triggers Mischa Sandberg
23:38 Re: SQL compliant interval implementation Michael Glaesemann
23:59 Re: Why is CVS server so slow? Michael Fuhr

24 May 2006

00:30 Improving ALTER TYPE support John Jawed
01:20 Re: Improving ALTER TYPE support Josh Berkus
01:21 Re: Why is CVS server so slow? Josh Berkus
02:55 Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes Tom Lane
02:58 Re: Why is CVS server so slow? Tom Lane
03:15 Re: Improving ALTER TYPE support John Jawed
03:57 Re: Performance Issues Dhanaraj M
04:11 Re: Performance Issues Christopher Kings-Lynne
04:28 Re: Performance Issues Tom Lane
06:16 Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes Qingqing Zhou
07:56 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
08:07 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Hannu Krosing
08:15 Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention Gavin Hamill
08:22 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Hannu Krosing
08:22 Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
08:46 compiling source code!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! sibel karaasma
09:36 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Andreas Joseph Krogh
09:43 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Andreas Joseph Krogh
11:13 Updatable views/with check option parsing Peter Eisentraut
11:32 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Hannu Krosing
12:47 Re: problem with PQsendQuery/PQgetResult and COPY FROM statement max.poletto@gmail.com
13:16 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Simon Riggs
13:41 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Tom Lane
13:53 Re: Improving ALTER TYPE support Tom Lane
13:55 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Andrew Dunstan
14:46 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Hannu Krosing
15:16 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Alvaro Herrera
15:28 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Andrew Dunstan
17:49 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Tom Lane
18:42 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Tom Lane
18:52 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Andrej Ricnik-Bay
18:55 Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention Josh Berkus
19:04 Re: Improving ALTER TYPE support John Jawed
19:06 Re: Why is CVS server so slow? Marc G. Fournier
19:06 Re: problem with PQsendQuery/PQgetResult and COPY FROM statement Tom Lane
19:16 Re: Why is CVS server so slow? Dave Page
19:18 Re: Why is CVS server so slow? Magnus Hagander
19:25 Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention Tom Lane
19:32 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Andreas Joseph Krogh
19:33 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Andreas Joseph Krogh
19:33 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid korry
20:01 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid korry
20:06 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Alvaro Herrera
20:08 Re: Improving ALTER TYPE support Tom Lane
20:11 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Simon Riggs
20:12 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
20:19 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid korry
20:30 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Andrew Dunstan
20:34 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Alvaro Herrera
20:35 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Tom Lane
20:36 Re: Improving ALTER TYPE support Josh Berkus
20:37 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Alvaro Herrera
20:40 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Alvaro Herrera
20:50 Re: Improving ALTER TYPE support John Jawed
21:07 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Andrew Dunstan
21:21 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Joshua D. Drake
21:23 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid korry
21:28 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid korry
21:33 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Alvaro Herrera
21:33 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Tom Lane
21:35 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Alvaro Herrera
21:40 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
21:46 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Tom Lane
21:46 Re: compiling source code!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Reini Urban
21:49 Re: compiling source code!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Jim C. Nasby
22:20 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid korry
22:34 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid korry
22:37 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Tom Lane
22:39 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Alvaro Herrera
22:53 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Tom Lane
23:20 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid korry
23:52 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid korry
23:53 v814 + OSX10.4.6 builds OK, but fails launch ... Richard
23:55 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Tom Lane

25 May 2006

00:10 Re: v814 + OSX10.4.6 builds OK, but fails launch ... Tom Lane
00:17 timezones to own config file Joachim Wieland
00:19 Re: v814 + OSX10.4.6 builds OK, but fails launch ... Richard
00:29 Re: v814 + OSX10.4.6 builds OK, but fails launch ... Tom Lane
00:30 Re: v814 + OSX10.4.6 builds OK, but fails launch ... Joshua D. Drake
00:46 Re: v814 + OSX10.4.6 builds OK, but fails launch ... Richard
00:48 Re: v814 + OSX10.4.6 builds OK, but fails launch ... Tom Lane
00:55 Re: v814 + OSX10.4.6 builds OK, but fails launch ... Richard
01:13 Re: timezones to own config file Tom Lane
02:33 Gborg and pgfoundry Bruce Momjian
05:36 Re: compiling source code!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Gurjeet Singh
05:46 Re: compiling source code!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Gurjeet Singh
06:09 ipig
09:55 Re: compiling source code!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Andrew Dunstan
10:44 Re: compiling source code!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Gurjeet Singh
11:01 XLogArchivingActive Andreas Pflug
11:36 Re: problem with PQsendQuery/PQgetResult and COPY FROM statement Massimiliano Poletto
12:26 Re: Alvaro Herrera
12:34 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid korry
12:52 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Andreas Joseph Krogh
13:41 Rename standard_conforming_strings to standard_strings Bruce Momjian
13:46 Re: Bruce Momjian
13:54 Re: Rename standard_conforming_strings to standard_strings Bruce Momjian
14:03 Re: XLogArchivingActive Tom Lane
14:03 Re: problem with PQsendQuery/PQgetResult and COPY FROM statement Tom Lane
14:10 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid Tom Lane
14:13 Re: Rename standard_conforming_strings to standard_strings Tom Lane
14:36 Re: Gborg and pgfoundry David Fetter
14:54 Postgres Crashes on Win2K chelsea boot
15:25 Re: XLogArchivingActive Andreas Pflug
15:43 psql \copy warning Jeremy Drake
16:04 Re: XLogArchivingActive Tom Lane
16:17 Inefficient bytea escaping? Andreas Pflug
16:24 Re: XLogArchivingActive Andreas Pflug
16:48 Re: Gborg and pgfoundry Bruce Momjian
17:09 Re: Postgres Crashes on Win2K Robert Treat
17:11 Re: Gborg and pgfoundry Joshua D. Drake
17:17 Re: Gborg and pgfoundry David Fetter
17:18 Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes Rodrigo Hjort
17:18 Re: Gborg and pgfoundry Marc G. Fournier
17:22 Re: Gborg and pgfoundry Larry Rosenman
17:31 Re: Gborg and pgfoundry Andrew Dunstan
17:38 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? Tom Lane
17:39 Re: Gborg and pgfoundry Marc G. Fournier
17:46 Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes Andrew Sullivan
18:04 Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes Dave Cramer
18:18 Re: Gborg and pgfoundry Joshua D. Drake
18:24 8.1.4 build failure on ICC 9.1 Joshua D. Drake
18:37 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? Andreas Pflug
18:46 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? Tom Lane
18:54 Re: 8.1.4 build failure on ICC 9.1 Tom Lane
19:05 Re: 8.1.4 build failure on ICC 9.1 Jeremy Drake
19:25 GIN stuck in loop during PITR Andreas Seltenreich
20:08 Re: Gborg and pgfoundry Larry Rosenman
20:59 Re: Gborg and pgfoundry Marc G. Fournier
21:54 Re: XLogArchivingActive Jim Nasby
21:55 Re: Gborg and pgfoundry Josh Berkus
22:16 Re: XLogArchivingActive Andreas Pflug
22:16 Re: XLogArchivingActive Tom Lane
23:41 Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes Rodrigo Hjort

26 May 2006

00:57 Re: Gborg and pgfoundry Josh Berkus
04:35 Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes Greg Stark
06:50 Bug with UTF-8 character Hans-Jürgen Schönig
07:50 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Peter Eisentraut
08:09 Re: GIN stuck in loop during PITR Teodor Sigaev
08:22 max(*) Dennis Bjorklund
09:59 Re: XLogArchivingActive Simon Riggs
10:09 Re: max(*) Simon Riggs
10:15 Re: XLogArchivingActive Andreas Pflug
10:38 Re: XLogArchivingActive Andreas Pflug
12:03 Re: XLogArchivingActive Simon Riggs
12:59 Re: v814 + OSX10.4.6 builds OK, but fails launch ... Martijn van Oosterhout
13:03 Re: timezones to own config file Martijn van Oosterhout
13:23 Re: XLogArchivingActive Tom Lane
13:46 Re: max(*) Gurjeet Singh
13:48 Re: Bug with UTF-8 character Martijn van Oosterhout
14:17 Re: Bug with UTF-8 character Marko Kreen
14:17 Re: XLogArchivingActive Andreas Pflug
14:35 Re: Bug with UTF-8 character Tom Lane
14:37 Re: Bug with UTF-8 character Martijn van Oosterhout
14:43 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Andrew Dunstan
14:50 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Tom Lane
15:03 Re: max(*) Tom Lane
15:08 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Martijn van Oosterhout
15:55 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? Andreas Pflug
16:31 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
16:38 Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes Jim C. Nasby
16:40 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Tom Lane
17:18 Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes Martijn van Oosterhout
17:27 Creating a case insensitive data type Dave
17:30 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? Tom Lane
18:05 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Greg Stark
18:23 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? Andreas Pflug
18:50 Re: Creating a case insensitive data type Martijn van Oosterhout
19:06 Re: max(*) Jim C. Nasby
19:33 Re: max(*) Bruno Wolff III
19:38 Re: max(*) Tom Lane
19:45 Re: GIN stuck in loop during PITR Andreas Seltenreich
19:47 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
19:59 Re: XLogArchivingActive Bruce Momjian
20:01 Re: XLogArchivingActive Jim C. Nasby
20:10 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? Tom Lane
20:11 Re: XLogArchivingActive Jim C. Nasby
20:15 Re: GIN stuck in loop during PITR Andreas Seltenreich
20:22 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Simon Riggs
20:42 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Tom Lane
21:04 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting Jim C. Nasby
21:19 Question about "name" datatype Greg Stark
21:35 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Peter Eisentraut
22:03 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Andrew Dunstan
22:23 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Peter Eisentraut
23:00 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? Tom Lane
23:20 Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes Mark Woodward
23:23 Re: Question about "name" datatype Tom Lane
23:26 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Tom Lane
23:32 Re: max(*) Robert Treat
23:39 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Andrew Dunstan
23:43 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Tom Lane
23:59 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Peter Eisentraut

27 May 2006

00:14 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Tom Lane
02:42 pg_proc probin misuse James William Pye
02:51 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Tom Lane
03:23 Re: pg_proc probin misuse Tom Lane
08:10 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Hannu Krosing
11:15 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? Marko Kreen
11:52 Re: XLogArchivingActive Andreas Pflug
11:53 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? Andreas Pflug
12:46 Inserting Picture to Bytea Gera Mel Handumon
12:56 Re: Inserting Picture to Bytea Andrew Dunstan
13:56 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Tom Lane
14:12 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? Tom Lane
14:57 Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes Tom Lane
15:36 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? Marko Kreen
15:46 Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes Martijn van Oosterhout
15:52 Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes Tom Lane
16:28 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? Martijn van Oosterhout
17:23 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? Marko Kreen
17:57 error in compilation! Gurjeet Singh
18:33 Re: error in compilation! Tom Lane
18:43 Re: error in compilation! Bruce Momjian
19:07 anoncvs still slow Michael Fuhr
19:18 Re: error in compilation! Tom Lane
19:35 Re: error in compilation! Gurjeet Singh
20:02 Better to dump tabs as tabs, or \t? Tom Lane
20:14 Re: Better to dump tabs as tabs, or \t? Andrew Dunstan
20:44 Re: Better to dump tabs as tabs, or \t? Marko Kreen
20:46 Re: anoncvs still slow Tom Lane
20:53 Re: Better to dump tabs as tabs, or \t? Tom Lane
21:17 Re: pg_proc probin misuse James William Pye
21:31 Re: anoncvs still slow Marc G. Fournier
21:46 Re: error in compilation! Tom Lane
22:00 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? Martijn van Oosterhout
23:48 osprey buildfarm member has been failing for a long while Tom Lane

28 May 2006

02:08 Re: osprey buildfarm member has been failing for a long while Andrew Dunstan
02:16 Re: error in compilation! Gurjeet Singh
02:42 Re: error in compilation! Bruce Momjian
02:42 Re: error in compilation! Bruce Momjian
03:15 Re: Better to dump tabs as tabs, or \t? Bruce Momjian
03:33 Re: RELKIND_SPECIAL Alvaro Herrera
04:40 Schema Limitations ? Chris Broussard
09:00 Re: osprey buildfarm member has been failing for a long while Rémi Zara
11:45 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? Marko Kreen
12:32 Error in recent pg_dump change (coverity) Martijn van Oosterhout
15:42 Re: Error in recent pg_dump change (coverity) Alvaro Herrera
15:43 Re: osprey buildfarm member has been failing for a long while Tom Lane
16:00 Re: Error in recent pg_dump change (coverity) Tom Lane
16:01 Re: Error in recent pg_dump change (coverity) Martijn van Oosterhout
16:13 Re: Error in recent pg_dump change (coverity) Martijn van Oosterhout
16:19 Re: Error in recent pg_dump change (coverity) Tom Lane
16:47 Re: Error in recent pg_dump change (coverity) Alvaro Herrera
17:07 Re: Error in recent pg_dump change (coverity) Tom Lane
17:38 Re: Error in recent pg_dump change (coverity) Alvaro Herrera
17:40 Re: Error in recent pg_dump change (coverity) Bruce Momjian
17:42 Re: Error in recent pg_dump change (coverity) Alvaro Herrera
17:53 COPY FROM view Alvaro Herrera
19:25 Re: anoncvs still slow Magnus Hagander
19:55 Re: anoncvs still slow Devrim GUNDUZ
19:59 Re: COPY FROM view Tom Lane
20:08 psql: krb5_sendauth: Bad application version was sent (via sendauth) - Windows 2000, MIT Kerberos, PG v 8.1.1 Eric Montague
20:14 Re: COPY FROM view David Fetter
20:43 Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes Heikki Linnakangas
21:26 Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes Martijn van Oosterhout
21:53 Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes Tom Lane
23:43 Re: anoncvs still slow Joshua D. Drake

29 May 2006

01:14 Re: pg_proc probin misuse Tom Lane
04:53 non-transactional pg_class Alvaro Herrera
05:10 Re: pg_proc probin misuse PFC
05:21 Re: COPY FROM view Hannu Krosing
06:01 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? Thomas Hallgren
06:52 Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes Martijn van Oosterhout
07:01 Re: pg_proc probin misuse James William Pye
09:22 Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
11:07 some question about deadlock ipig
13:44 Re: COPY FROM view Bruce Momjian
13:49 Re: some question about deadlock Bruce Momjian
13:56 Re: pg_proc probin misuse Tom Lane
14:47 Re: non-transactional pg_class Tom Lane
15:22 Re: some question about deadlock ipig
15:23 question about security hole CVE-2006-2313 and UTF-8 Albe Laurenz
15:26 Re: some question about deadlock Bruce Momjian
15:43 Re: some question about deadlock Bruce Momjian
15:44 Re: some question about deadlock ipig
15:52 Re: some question about deadlock Tom Lane
16:01 Re: question about security hole CVE-2006-2313 and UTF-8 Tom Lane
16:11 Re: some question about deadlock ipig
16:16 Re: some question about deadlock Tom Lane
16:26 Proposal for debugging of server-side stored procedures Mark Cave-Ayland
17:05 Re: Proposal for debugging of server-side stored procedures Tom Lane
17:14 Re: anoncvs still slow Marc G. Fournier
17:27 Re: anoncvs still slow Magnus Hagander
17:34 Re: anoncvs still slow Marc G. Fournier
17:46 Re: anoncvs still slow Magnus Hagander
18:00 Re: anoncvs still slow Marc G. Fournier
18:03 Re: Proposal for debugging of server-side stored procedures Thomas Hallgren
18:20 Re: anoncvs still slow Magnus Hagander
18:21 Re: anoncvs still slow Andrew Sullivan
18:26 Re: anoncvs still slow Magnus Hagander
18:29 Re: Proposal for debugging of server-side stored procedures Tom Lane
19:07 Re: Proposal for debugging of server-side stored procedures Thomas Hallgren
19:38 Compile libpq with vc8 Yannick
19:40 Re: Compile libpq with vc8 Bruce Momjian
20:09 type recv/send functions Greg Stark
20:16 Re: Proposal for debugging of server-side stored procedures Lukas Smith
21:21 Re: osprey buildfarm member has been failing for a long while Rémi Zara
21:52 Re: pg_proc probin misuse Bruce Momjian
22:10 Re: pg_proc probin misuse PFC
23:28 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? Bruce Momjian

30 May 2006

01:29 Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention Bruce Momjian
02:47 pg_resetxlog -f flag Bruce Momjian
02:54 Re: type recv/send functions Tom Lane
03:12 Re: Altering view ownership doesn't work ... Bruce Momjian
03:24 Re: Altering view ownership doesn't work ... Tom Lane
03:33 Re: type recv/send functions Greg Stark
03:42 Re: type recv/send functions Tom Lane
07:44 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? Marko Kreen
12:29 plperl's ppport.h out of date? Tom Lane
12:50 64bit build vs 32 bit build Dave Cramer
13:09 Re: 64bit build vs 32 bit build Martijn van Oosterhout
13:20 session id and global storage David Hoksza
13:42 Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date? Andrew Dunstan
13:46 Re: [GENERAL] 8.1.4 - problem with PITR - .backup.done / backup.ready version of the same file at the same time. Tom Lane
14:08 Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date? Tom Lane
14:36 Re: 64bit build vs 32 bit build Tom Lane
15:00 Re: Compile libpq with vc8 Jeff McKenna
15:10 Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date? Tom Lane
15:17 Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date? Andrew Dunstan
15:29 Re: [ADMIN] Problem building initdb on sparc10 Tom Lane
15:34 Re: [ADMIN] Problem building initdb on sparc10 Averbukh Stella
15:35 Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date? Tom Lane
17:52 Re: anoncvs still slow Jim C. Nasby
18:01 Re: anoncvs still slow Andrew Dunstan
18:12 Re: anoncvs still slow Alvaro Herrera
18:17 Re: anoncvs still slow Andrew Dunstan
18:17 Re: [GENERAL] 8.1.4 - problem with PITR - .backup.done / Rafael Martinez
19:21 Re: anoncvs still slow Marc G. Fournier
19:33 Re: timezones to own config file Joachim Wieland
19:39 Re: [GENERAL] 8.1.4 - problem with PITR - .backup.done / backup.ready version of the same file at the same time. Tom Lane
20:46 Looking for Postgres Developers to fix problem Mandy Abrahams
20:52 Re: Looking for Postgres Developers to fix problem Andrew Dunstan
20:57 Re: [GENERAL] 8.1.4 - problem with PITR - .backup.done / Rafael Martinez
21:17 Re: anoncvs still slow Martijn van Oosterhout
22:20 Re: [PATCHES] Magic block for modules Tom Lane
22:38 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Greg Stark
23:02 Re: anoncvs still slow Jim C. Nasby

31 May 2006

00:32 Re: anoncvs still slow Marc G. Fournier
01:51 Re: Looking for Postgres Developers to fix problem Bruno Wolff III
02:41 Re: Looking for Postgres Developers to fix problem Christopher Browne
02:47 PQescapeIdentifier Christopher Kings-Lynne
03:08 Re: PQescapeIdentifier Tom Lane
03:12 Re: PQescapeIdentifier Christopher Kings-Lynne
03:35 LinkedIn Christopher Kings-Lynne
04:59 Re: LinkedIn Josh Berkus
06:26 Re: LinkedIn Christopher Kings-Lynne
06:44 Re: [PATCHES] Magic block for modules Martijn van Oosterhout
07:22 Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date? Martijn van Oosterhout
07:29 Re: PQescapeIdentifier Dave Page
08:06 Re: [PATCHES] Magic block for modules Magnus Hagander
09:28 Re: Compile libpq with vc8 Bruce Momjian
09:38 copy with compression progress n Andreas Pflug
09:47 Re: [PATCHES] Magic block for modules Bruce Momjian
12:42 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix calculation of plan node extParams to account for the Jackie Leng
13:53 Re: [ADMIN] Problem building initdb on sparc10 Averbukh Stella
14:13 Still not happy with psql's multiline history behavior Tom Lane
14:15 Re: [PATCHES] Magic block for modules Tom Lane
14:17 Re: Compile libpq with vc8 Yannick
14:27 Re: copy with compression progress n Tom Lane
15:03 Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Tom Lane
15:03 Re: Compile libpq with vc8 Andrew Dunstan
15:27 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Andrew Dunstan
15:28 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe David Fetter
15:31 Re: copy with compression progress n Andreas Pflug
15:37 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Andreas Pflug
15:41 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Andreas Pflug
15:49 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Dave Page
16:26 Re: copy with compression progress n Tom Lane
16:30 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Tom Lane
16:35 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Andreas Pflug
16:43 Re: copy progress notification Andreas Pflug
17:17 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Joshua D. Drake
17:27 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Andreas Pflug
17:28 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Magnus Hagander
18:04 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Chris Browne
18:13 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Andreas Pflug
18:50 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Andrew Dunstan
19:14 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe David Fetter
19:30 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Andrew Dunstan
19:45 More thoughts about planner's cost estimates Tom Lane
19:49 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Greg Stark
19:52 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Dave Page
19:56 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Dave Page
19:58 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Alvaro Herrera
19:59 Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition Andrew Dunstan
20:08 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Steve Atkins
20:08 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Magnus Hagander
20:10 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Tom Lane
20:10 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Tom Lane
20:12 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Andrew Dunstan
20:17 Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date? Devrim GUNDUZ
20:24 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Dave Page
20:52 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Martijn van Oosterhout
20:55 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Andreas Pflug
21:05 Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date? Andrew Dunstan
21:13 Does anyone see value in src/tutorial/beard.c ? Tom Lane
21:20 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Magnus Hagander
21:33 Generalized concept of modules Tom Lane
21:48 Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe Joshua D. Drake
22:40 Re: session id and global storage David Hoksza
23:42 server crash on recursive function invocation Ali Baba