Re: Bug in signal handler - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Douglas McNaught
Subject Re: Bug in signal handler
Date
Msg-id 87mzdon40t.fsf@suzuka.mcnaught.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in signal handler [Was: [TODO] Allow commenting  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Responses Re: Bug in signal handler
Re: Bug in signal handler
List pgsql-hackers
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:

> Running unsafe functions within a signal handler is not unsafe per-se.
> It's only unsafe if the main program could also be running unsafe
> functions.

I don't disagree with your reasoning, but does POSIX actually say
this?

-Doug


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in signal handler [Was: [TODO] Allow commenting
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clean up code associated with updating pg_class statistics