Re: error in compilation! - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: error in compilation!
Date
Msg-id 200605280242.k4S2gqx23730@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: error in compilation!  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Currently looking through the rest of the patch.  I'm wondering
> > about appendStringLiteral: maybe we should kill that entirely
> > in favor of using PQescapeStringConn?  It's not nearly bright
> > enough about encoding for instance (and it *will* be used in
> > client-only encodings).
> 
> We could make an appendStringLiteralConn, which would do this correctly
> for most of the utility programs.  However there's a problem for
> pg_restore: it doesn't necessarily have a PGconn at all.  (Consider
> the case of pg_restore producing text output.)
> 
> It seems that the alternatives are to export PQescapeStringInternal
> from libpq, or to duplicate its functionality in appendStringLiteral.
> Don't much like either, but perhaps the second is less bad.  Any
> opinions?

I like the export idea myself.  The less duplicate code the better.

--  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: error in compilation!
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Better to dump tabs as tabs, or \t?