Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition
Date
Msg-id 1148394257.2646.811.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 09:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at> writes:
> >>> We don't need a disinherit do we?
> 
> > I propose: ALTER TABLE childN INHERITS ();
> > Thus I also think, that the list should be complete, and is not an
> > addition to existing inheritance.
> 
> Don't like that at all: it seems far too error-prone.

What types of error do you think its prone to? 

Can you say what you would prefer?

As ever, not that worried about syntax, but I would like to get
agreement on a specific way forward now we're discussing this.

--  Simon Riggs              EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance Issues
Next
From: Csaba Nagy
Date:
Subject: Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition