Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date
Msg-id 446CC844.70705@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?  ("Mark Woodward" <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> 
> While I do agree with the ideal, the reality may not be good enough. Even
> I, a PostgreSQL user for a decade, have to use MySQL right now because
> that is what the client uses.

Then you aren't choosing your clients wisely. :)

I am not trying to be rude, but if you don't want to use MySQL, don't. 
We don't and we are testament to the fact that it is indeed possible to 
make a living off of JUST PostgreSQL.

The only time we touch a different database is to MIGRATE from that 
database.

Joshua D. Drake



-- 
   === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240   Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL
solutionssince 1997             http://www.commandprompt.com/
 




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Hallgren
Date:
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?