Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Hallgren
Subject Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date
Msg-id 446CC52C.7000502@tada.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?  (John DeSoi <desoi@pgedit.com>)
Responses Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
John DeSoi wrote:
> 
> Right, you'll definitely need to hack the C source code to force 
> PostgreSQL to accept invalid dates ;)
> 
> http://sql-info.de/mysql/gotchas.html#1_14
> 
Couldn't we just install something that replaced invalid dates with a randomly generated but 
otherwise correct dates? That way they would become completely invisible. No one could even 
tell that the date was invalid to start with.

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mark Woodward"
Date:
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?