Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date
Msg-id 20060519153821.GH17873@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?  ("Mark Woodward" <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>)
Responses Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 02:58:11PM -0400, Mark Woodward wrote:
> The reality is that MySQL is widely supported by some very, shall we say,
> "interesting" open source projects and using these products with
> PostgreSQL would be a plus.

The biggest headache I find with using postgres is that various GPL
licenced programs have trouble directly shipping postgresql support
because of our use of OpenSSL. Each and every one of those program
needs to add an exception to their licence for distributors to
distribute postgresql support.

I'm thinking particularly of FreeRadius but there are others. More than
once I thought while waiting for stuff to compile: if I'd chosen mysql
I'd be done by now...

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Weird ..... (a=1 or a=2) <> (a=2 or a=1)
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: New feature proposal