Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date
Msg-id 446DEE4D.8030705@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Responses Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
List pgsql-hackers
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 02:58:11PM -0400, Mark Woodward wrote:
>> The reality is that MySQL is widely supported by some very, shall we say,
>> "interesting" open source projects and using these products with
>> PostgreSQL would be a plus.
> 
> The biggest headache I find with using postgres is that various GPL
> licenced programs have trouble directly shipping postgresql support
> because of our use of OpenSSL. Each and every one of those program
> needs to add an exception to their licence for distributors to
> distribute postgresql support.

Why would that be the case... OpenSSL and PostgreSQL both are BSD 
licensed... Am I missing something?

Joshua D. Drake

> 
> I'm thinking particularly of FreeRadius but there are others. More than
> once I thought while waiting for stuff to compile: if I'd chosen mysql
> I'd be done by now...
> 
> Have a nice day,


-- 
   === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240   Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL
solutionssince 1997             http://www.commandprompt.com/
 




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?