Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Dawid Kuroczko
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date
Msg-id 758d5e7f0605221156k6721b74ak341351f2ffba709e@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?  ("Dawid Kuroczko" <qnex42@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On 5/22/06, Mark Woodward <pgsql@mohawksoft.com> wrote:
> > Except that apt doesn't work on all platforms. Though it would certainly
> > make sense to look at lifting the framework for CPgAN from somewhere,
> > rather than coding it ourselves.
>
> A CPgAN would be a great idea in theory, but I have reservations.
>
> As a software developer, I'm fine with pgfoundery, but as a DB admin, and
> one who deploys data centers from time to time, I'd like to see something
> closer to the contrib.
>
> If I could have any influence at all, I'd like to see "contrib"
> essentially go away in the main distribution and replaced or renamed
> "extensions." Then, some advisory group "blesses" extensions, and those
> extensions get packaged into a PostgreSQL extensions pack. I, again as a
> DB admin, would have NO problem with PostgreSQL playing favorites and
> picking best of breed for these extensions.

The "problem" with contrib is that no actively developed projects should
be there.  It is a feature, not a bug.  If it is actively developed, it may be
buggy. If it is proven over time, it can be safely used.  Also, for a contrib
it is inefficient to release a whole -contrib whenever a subproject releases
new release.  This "forces" -contrib to use stable-and-unchanging packages.
This also makes it extremaly hard to put new or niche projects.  New are
risky, because they may need immediate bugfixes.  Niche projects used
by a minority of users bloat -contrib and force more frequent releases,
both of which are well, not preferred.

Of course -contrib is great, we all know it. I think a "CPgAN" would be
a good testbed/incubator for new packages, some of which should
eventually get into -contrib.

Also, assuming there is a "pginstall dbanme packagename" interface,
a -contrib package should register all its subpackages within that
system.  So, you install postgresql-contrib, and then you can type:

pg_package install mydb index/ltree

and later, provided you change your mind:

pg_package remove mydb index/ltree
(with -f option to "insert CASCADE whenever possible ;)).

This would be somewhat similar to current createlang(1) and friends. :)

   Regards,
      Dawid

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?