On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 12:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Well, the fact that there's only one archiver *now* doesn't mean there
> > wasn't more than one when the problem happened. The orphaned archiver
> > would eventually quit.
>
> But, actually, nevermind: we have explained the failures you were seeing
> in the test setup, but a multiple-active-archiver situation still
> doesn't explain the original situation of incoming connections getting
> blocked.
Agreed.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
