Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection?
Date
Msg-id 1148055931.2646.669.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 12:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Well, the fact that there's only one archiver *now* doesn't mean there
> > wasn't more than one when the problem happened.  The orphaned archiver
> > would eventually quit.
>
> But, actually, nevermind: we have explained the failures you were seeing
> in the test setup, but a multiple-active-archiver situation still
> doesn't explain the original situation of incoming connections getting
> blocked.

Agreed.

--
  Simon Riggs
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax
Next
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?