Re: type recv/send functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: type recv/send functions
Date
Msg-id 18984.1148957629@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to type recv/send functions  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: type recv/send functions
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> Is it just me or are the send/recv strangely asymmetric?

Not all that much: they both return a meaningful result.  We cheated a
little bit by allowing the recv functions to modify the state of their
input argument, but they still deliver a valid result object.

> Wouldn't the natural thing to do be to provide the StringInfo buffer with a
> cursor for the type's send function to stuff the bytea into?

Then the send function would return void, which is surely not more
natural.  Also, there would be a much larger disparity between the
behaviors of the text and binary output paths.

Anyway it's about three years too late to be debating this ;-)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: pg_resetxlog -f flag
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Altering view ownership doesn't work ...