korry wrote:
> > The Win32 API for locking seems mighty strange to me.
>
> Linux/Unix byte locking is advisory (meaning that one lock can block
> another lock, but it can't block a read).
No -- it is advisory meaning that a process that does not try to acquire
the lock is not locked out. You can certainly block a file in exclusive
mode, using the LOCK_EX flag. (And at least on my Linux system, there
is mandatory locking too, using the fcntl() interface).
I think the next question is -- how would the lock interface be used?
We could acquire an exclusive lock on postmaster start (to make sure no
backend is running), then reduce it to a shared lock. Every backend
would inherit the shared lock. But the lock exchange is not guaranteed
to be atomic so a new postmaster could start just after we acquire the
lock and acquire the shared lock. It'd need to be complemented with
another lock.
> Win32 locking is mandatory (at least in the most portable form) so a
> lock blocks a reader.
There is also shared/exclusive locking of a file on Win32. My comment
weas more directed at the fact that you have to "create some sort of
lock handle" from a file handle and then lock the lock handle, or
something like that. I don't recall the exact details but it was
strange (as opposed to just open and then flock).
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
