Re: Compression and on-disk sorting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ron Mayer
Subject Re: Compression and on-disk sorting
Date
Msg-id 446902C2.9050707@cheapcomplexdevices.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Compression and on-disk sorting  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
Responses Re: Compression and on-disk sorting  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> 
> There's an fadvise that tells the OS to compress the data if it actually
> makes it to disk?

Compressed-filesystem extension (like e2compr, and I think either
Fat or NTFS) can do that.

I think the reasons against adding this feature to postgresql are
largely the same as the reasons why compressed filesystems aren't
very popular.

Has anyone tried running postgresql on a compressing file-system?
I'd expect the penalties to outweigh the benefits (or they'd be
more common); but if it gives impressive results, it might add
weight to this feature idea.

  Ron M

I think the real reason Oracle and others practically re-wrote
their own VM-system and filesystems is that at the time it was
important for them to run under Windows98; where it was rather
easy to write better filesystems than your customer's OS was
bundled with.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Iterating generator from C (PostgreSQL's
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Compression and on-disk sorting