Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Am Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 10:10 schrieb Martijn van Oosterhout:
> You want to make a GUC that makes:
>
> BEGIN;
> BEGIN;
>
> Leave you with an aborted transaction? That seems like a singularly
> useless feature...

If a command doesn't do what it is supposed to do, then it should be an error.  
That seems like a throroughly useful feature to me.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/